Description
1 online resource (50 pages).
Core Metadata
| identifier | |
| blake2b |
9ec3c3664503e69cb39a428655e61046a6d9ca52d12ed6e1161b5a312bbb1a14e9ee6d174a319a0d6538f19e7512b18851c4dc1cb73c082296af930af53fb781
|
| id |
gpo53842/www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-113hrpt629/pdf/CRPT-113hrpt629.pdf
|
| format |
application/pdf
|
| size |
342767
|
| dataset_id |
fdlp
|
| meta_url | |
| download_url |
Additional Metadata
JSON
{
"Author": "United States. Congress. House. Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, author.",
"CGP Record Link": "https://catalog.gpo.gov:443/F/?func=direct\u0026doc_number=000939785\u0026local_base=GPO01PUB",
"Content Type": "text",
"Description": "1 online resource (50 pages).",
"Format": "online resource",
"General Note": "Title from title screen caption (viewed December 9, 2014).\n\"December 1, 2014.\"",
"Genre/Form": "Legislative materials.",
"Holdings": "All items",
"Internet Access": "PDF version https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo53842\nText version https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo53843",
"Item Number": "1008-I (online)",
"LC Number": "KF32 .P896 2014v",
"Linking Field": "Print version: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 (OCoLC)897940614\nMicrofiche version: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 (OCoLC)904399556",
"OCLC Number": "(OCoLC)897833422",
"Published": "[Washington, D.C.] : [U.S. Government Printing Office], [2014]",
"Series": "(United States. Congress. House. Report ; 113-629.)",
"SuDoc Number": "Y 1.1/8:113-629",
"Subject": "Amtrak -- Appropriations and expenditures.\nAmtrak -- Management.\nUnited States. Federal Railroad Administration -- Rules and practice.",
"Subject - LC": "Railroad law -- United States.\nPassenger trains -- United States -- Finance.\nPassenger trains -- United States -- Management.",
"System Number": "000939785",
"Title": "Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 : report (to accompany H.R. 5449) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office).",
"URL": "PDF version http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-113hrpt629/pdf/CRPT-113hrpt629.pdf\nText version http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-113hrpt629/html/CRPT-113hrpt629.htm"
}
Would you train on this document?
Document Viewer
text/plain
49–006 113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 113–629 PASSENGER RAIL REFORM AND INVESTMENT ACT OF 2014 DECEMBER 1, 2014.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. SHUSTER, from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, submitted the following R E P O R T [To accompany H.R. 5449] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 5449) to reauthorize Federal support for passenger rail programs, and for other purposes, having considered the same, report favorably thereon with amendments and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. CONTENTS Page Purpose of Legislation ............................................................................................. 2 Background and Need for Legislation .................................................................... 2 Hearings ................................................................................................................... 4 Legislative History and Consideration .................................................................. 4 Committee Votes ...................................................................................................... 4 Committee Oversight Findings ............................................................................... 4 New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures ...................................................... 5 Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate .......................................................... 5 Performance Goals and Objectives ......................................................................... 9 Advisory of Earmarks .............................................................................................. 9 Duplication of Federal Programs ............................................................................ 9 Disclosure of Directed Rule Makings ..................................................................... 9 Federal Mandate Statement ................................................................................... 9 Preemption Clarification ......................................................................................... 9 Advisory Committee Statement .............................................................................. 10 Applicability of Legislative Branch ........................................................................ 10 Section-by-Section Analysis of Legislation ............................................................ 10 Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported ..................................... 19 The amendments (stated in terms of the page and line numbers of the introduced bill) are as follows: Page 45, after line 14, insert the following: emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 2 (4) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation’’ and inserting ‘‘To the extent amounts are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation’’; (5) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘, to the extent provided in advance in appropriations Acts’’ after ‘‘as appropriate’’; Page 45, line 15, strike ‘‘(4)’’ and insert ‘‘(6)’’. Page 45, line 17, strike ‘‘(5)’’ and insert ‘‘(7)’’. PURPOSE OF LEGISLATION H.R. 5449 authorizes the nation’s passenger rail programs, including the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), and Amtrak’s Office of the Inspector General, and the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) loan and grant programs for rail investments. H.R. 5449 fundamentally changes the authorization structure of Amtrak by providing funding by service, or ‘‘lines of business’’, rather than applying the previous structure which provided separate grants for operating and capital/debt service activities. It also reforms Amtrak’s operations, budgeting, and planning processes, and allows for more private sector participation in stations, rights-of-way, and operations. H.R. 5449 makes further changes to intercity passenger rail policy administered by FRA, including revisions to grant programs, loan programs, and the delivery process for projects, to ensure better oversight and accelerate infrastructure projects. BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION For nearly 100 years, America was the unquestioned global leader in passenger rail. During that time, trains were the primary, and in many cases, the only, mode of transportation available for medium- and long-distance travel. However, the advent of commercial aviation and the Interstate Highway System provided new transportation alternatives and changed the equation. In the face of this stiff competition, our Nation’s passenger rail system faded into disuse and disrepair. Today, however, passenger rail presents one of the best hopes for relieving the country’s congested highways and airspace. In 2006, the United States population reached 300 million people, and by 2039 the country is expected to break the 400 million mark. The population concentration in the nation’s urban areas is increasing, in particular on the eastern seaboard and the Northeast Corridor (NEC) between Washington, DC, New York City, and Boston. Congestion costs also continue to rise. Crippling congestion and poor roads cost businesses and commuters almost $115 billion each year in wasted time and fuel—up from $24 billion in 1982. In addition, Americans spend more than 4 billion hours annually stuck in traffic. These statistics indicate that passenger rail must be part of the solution to the nation’s transportation needs. H.R. 5449, the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 (PRRIA), reforms emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 3 and improves the nation’s intercity passenger rail system to meet the challenges of the nation’s continued growth. Any reform of passenger rail must start with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), whose mission is to provide rail passenger service to the country. Since it began providing service in 1971, Amtrak has relied upon federal funds to remain solvent. While more efficient operations and reforms could help reduce reliance on federal funds, the full costs of operations and capital expenses will require federal funds for the foreseeable future. In addition to federal funding, Amtrak generates revenues from operations of its three functions, or lines of business: (1) NEC; (2) state-supported routes; and (3) long-distance routes. The NEC is a line of railroad track owned by Amtrak and others that runs from Washington, D.C., to Boston, Massachusetts. Amtrak operates both its higher speed Acela trains and lower speed regional trains on the NEC, while also managing the infrastructure. The majority of trains on the NEC, however, are not Amtrak’s, but commuter railroads’ serving major cities and their suburbs in the Northeast. Indeed, of the 2,000 daily trains on the NEC, only approximately 200 are Amtrak’s. These statistics underlie the importance of the NEC, but also show a strong need for infrastructure improvements and involvement of the states. PRRIA makes several significant steps to increase infrastructure investment in the NEC and improve planning and coordination among all users of the NEC to ensure the asset is properly utilized and improved for better service. Amtrak also operates 21 state-supported routes in 19 states, where states contribute funding to provide additional passenger rail services. These are corridors of less than 750 miles, primarily located in the Northeast, Midwest, and Pacific Coast, and connect major metropolitan areas. State-supported corridor services carry nearly half of Amtrak’s annual riders—about 15.1 million riders. While states are required by a previous authorization of Amtrak to contribute funding for these corridors, PRRIA ensures that states are accurately billed for the services Amtrak provides. It also establishes a dispute resolution mechanism to help resolve disagreements on costs for the service. Finally, Amtrak operates 15 long distance routes that utilize a network of over 18,500 miles of privately-owned freight rail track and carry more than 4.8 million passengers. These routes are primarily legacy routes taken over by Amtrak from the freight railroads when Amtrak was formed in 1971, and are the only Amtrak trains in 23 of the 46 states in the network. PRRIA ensures these routes are evaluated to enhance efficiency and reduce losses. PRRIA not only makes the above noted changes to the way each line-of-business is run, it also advances the lines-of-business approach by authorizing Amtrak funding for operations and capital into two accounts, the NEC account and the National Network account, which includes state-supported and long-distance routes. In addition, Amtrak’s planning and grant requests must be divided by line-of-business; therefore, on the whole, PRRIA advances Amtrak’s reorganization of the company into business lines, and prohibits cross-subsidization among accounts, except for specific transfer authority available after notification to the Amtrak Board of Directors. These reforms will enhance accountability and transparency, while improving the performance of each business line. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 4 Beyond Amtrak reforms, PRRIA also focuses on the development of the nation’s rail system generally. The bill leverages infrastructure resources, creates more opportunities for non-Federal participation in passenger rail, streamlines FRA processes for project development, improves procedures for FRA’s rail loan program, and enhances oversight of FRA-administered grant programs. Overall, PRRIA makes reforms to passenger rail infrastructure and programs that will help advance passenger rail as a solution for the nation’s transportation needs. HEARINGS On April 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials (Subcommittee) held a hearing on Amtrak’s grant request for fiscal year 2014, and how it relates to Amtrak’s on-going reorganization and the reauthorization of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008. On May 21, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing to discuss Amtrak’s financial performance by service type and overall trends in costs, its spending of federal funds, and how it runs as a business. On June 6–7, 2013, the Subcommittee hosted a roundtable on an Amtrak train to New York, NY and a field hearing in New York, NY, respectively, to assess and discuss the importance of the Northeast Corridor (NEC) to the states it serves, the regional economy, and transportation network. On June 27, 2013, the Subcommittee hosted a listening session and heard from major stakeholders on developing the nation’s rail policy for the next reauthorization. On July 9, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing on the role of innovative financing tools to advance intercity passenger rail projects. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND CONSIDERATION On September 11, 2014, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Bill Shuster and Ranking Member Nick Rahall and Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials Chairman Jeff Denham and Ranking Member Corrine Brown introduced H.R. 5449, the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act (PRRIA). On September 17, 2014, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure met in open session and ordered the bill reported favorably to the House by voice vote with a quorum present. No amendments were offered. COMMITTEE VOTES Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires each committee report to include the total number of votes cast for and against on each record vote on a motion to report and on any amendment offered to the measure or matter, and the names of those members voting for and against. There were no record votes taken in connection with consideration of H.R. 5449. COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee’s oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in this report. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 5 NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY AND TAX EXPENDITURES Clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives does not apply where a cost estimate and comparison prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 has been timely submitted prior to the filing of the report and is included in the report. Such a cost estimate is included in this report. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has received the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 5449 from the Director of the Congressional Budget Office: U.S. CONGRESS, CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE, Washington, DC, November 24, 2014. Hon. BILL SHUSTER, Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 5449, the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014. If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Sarah Puro. Sincerely, DOUGLAS W. ELMENDORF. Enclosure. H.R. 5449—Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 Summary: CBO estimates that H.R. 5449 would authorize the appropriation of $5.8 billion over the 2015–2019 period for rail programs administered by Amtrak, states, and the Department of Transportation (DOT). That amount includes $4.0 billion for grants to Amtrak, $1.2 billion for grants to states for intercity rail projects, and $500 million to renegotiate and prepay a portion of Amtrak’s nonfederal debt. Assuming appropriation of the amounts specified and estimated to be necessary, CBO estimates that implementing the legislation would cost $5.5 billion over the 2015–2019 period. Pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply to this legislation because it would not affect direct spending or revenues. H.R. 5449 would impose intergovernmental and private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) by requiring some state and local governments and Amtrak to create plans and submit reports about the capital assets of intercity passenger rail systems. The bill also would place new administrative and operational requirements on Amtrak. CBO estimates that the cost to both public and private entities of complying with those mandates would be small and would fall below the annual thresholds established in UMRA for intergovernmental and private-sector mandates ($76 million and $152 million in 2014, respectively, adjusted annually for inflation). emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 6 Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary effect of H.R. 5449 is shown in the following table. The cost of this legislation falls within budget function 400 (transportation). By fiscal year, in millions of dollars— 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015– 2019 CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION Capital and Operating Grants to Amtrak: Estimated Authorization Level ................................. 0 1,313 1,340 1,370 0 4,023 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 0 1,086 1,263 1,363 273 3,985 Cost to Renegotiate and Prepay Amtrak’s Nonfederal Debt: Estimated Authorization Level ................................. 0 125 125 125 125 500 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 0 125 125 125 125 500 Grants to States for Rail Projects: Authorization Level .................................................. 300 300 300 300 0 1,200 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 30 150 225 270 270 945 Amtrak Inspector General: Authorization Level .................................................. 0 24 24 25 0 73 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 0 22 24 25 2 73 Other Provisions: Estimated Authorization Level ................................. 0 2 2 1 0 5 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 0 1 2 1 1 5 Total Changes: Estimated Authorization Level ................................. 300 1,764 1,791 1,821 125 5,801 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 30 1,384 1,639 1,784 671 5,508 Basis of estimate: For this estimate, CBO assumes that the bill will be enacted by the end of calendar year 2014 and that the amounts authorized and estimated to be necessary will be appropriated each year. Spending is based on historical patterns of spending on rail programs. CAPITAL AND OPERATING GRANTS TO AMTRAK H.R. 5449 would restructure the federal government’s funding support for Amtrak and would authorize the appropriation of about $4.0 billion for grants to Amtrak over the 2015–2018 period, CBO estimates. That amount includes specified amounts for the rail network between Boston, Massachusetts, and Washington, DC, and for the rail network in other parts of the country. Amtrak received a grant of $1.4 billion for fiscal year 2014 and (on an annualized basis as part of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015) for fiscal year 2015, for activities similar to those authorized in H.R. 5449. Assuming appropriation of the authorized amounts, CBO estimates enacting those provisions would cost $4.0 billion over the 2015–2019 period. As directed by the legislation, the specified authorization levels in H.R. 5449 for this activity have been reduced by $375 million to account for the cost to renegotiate and prepay a portion of Amtrak’s debt over the 2016–2018 period. RENEGOTIATION AND PREPAYMENT OF AMTRAK’S NONFEDERAL DEBT Subject to the availability of appropriated funds, section 209 would require the Secretary of the Treasury to negotiate with Amtrak’s creditors to prepay Amtrak’s debt with the goal of reducing Amtrak’s debt-service costs. Under the assumption that the federal government will continue to provide Amtrak with grants to pay a emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 7 portion of its debt-service costs—as it has since 2006—those prepayments would also reduce future costs to the federal government. Based on information from Amtrak, it has about $1 billion in nonfederal debt. However, based on information from the Department of the Treasury, not all of that debt could be favorably renegotiated to result in savings to both Amtrak and the federal government. Much of Amtrak’s nonfederal debt is for lease payments it makes for railcars and locomotives. In some of those leases, Amtrak has the option, at times specified in the lease contracts, to buy out the remainder of the lease term and take ownership of the rail equipment. In such cases, the Treasury would calculate the net present value of the stream of future lease payments compared to the cost to buy out the lease term to determine if savings would accrue to both the federal government and to Amtrak. Other debt includes a mortgage on New York’s Penn Station and tax-exempt bonds that are not callable until fiscal year 2022. Based on information about the components of Amtrak’s debt, CBO estimates that implementing this provision would cost $500 million over the 2015–2019 period. Under provisions of the bill, any amounts appropriated to Amtrak to renegotiate and prepay its debt would reduce the amounts authorized to be appropriated by the bill for Amtrak’s Capital and Debt Service Grants. CBO estimates that $500 million would be authorized to be appropriated to prepay Amtrak’s debt over the 2015–2019 period. The amounts authorized to be appropriated for Amtrak’s Capital and Debt Service Grants have been reduced by only $375 million, however, because those grants are authorized for three years under H.R. 5449. Over the next five years, CBO estimates that Amtrak’s debt-serv- ice costs would be reduced by about $20 million a year. However, over the next couple of decades Amtrak’s debt service would be reduced by more than $500 million. If the federal government continues to support Amtrak’s Capital and Debt Service Grants, those lower costs could be used to reduce the amount of grants to Amtrak in the future or could be used for other Amtrak priorities, including capital spending. GRANTS TO STATES FOR RAIL PROJECTS Over the 2015–2018 period, the bill would authorize the appro- priation of about $1.2 billion in grants to states for capital costs related to facilities, infrastructure, and equipment necessary for intercity passenger rail service. No amounts were appropriated for such grants in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015. CBO estimates that spending for those grants would total $945 million over the 2015–2019 period. AMTRAK INSPECTOR GENERAL H.R. 5449 would authorize the appropriation of $96 million for the operations of the Amtrak Inspector General over the 2015–2018 period. However, that office received an appropriation of $23 million (on an annualized basis) in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015, the same amount authorized for 2015 by H.R. 5449. Therefore, CBO estimates that implementing those provisions would have no effect in 2015 and would cost $73 million over the 2016–2019 period. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 8 OTHER PROVISIONS H.R. 5449 would require the Federal Rail Administration (FRA) to establish a working group to assess the feasibility of restoring rail service between New Orleans, Louisiana, and Orlando, Florida. The bill also would require the FRA to complete a rulemaking to revise how federal reviews of planned freight and commuter rail projects are conducted in order to adjust how the agency complies with the Historic Preservation Act. Based on information from FRA, CBO estimates that implementing those provisions would cost $5 million over the 2015–2019 period. Pay-As-You-Go considerations: None. Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: H.R. 5449 would impose intergovernmental and private-sector mandates as defined in UMRA by placing new requirements on public entities and Amtrak. CBO estimates that the cost for those entities to comply with the mandates would be small and would fall below the annual thresholds established in UMRA for intergovernmental and private-sector mandates ($76 million and $152 million in 2014, respectively, adjusted annually for inflation). MANDATES THAT APPLY TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTITIES H.R. 5449 would impose an intergovernmental and private-sector mandate by requiring some state and local governments and Amtrak to create plans and submit reports about the capital assets of intercity passenger rail systems. CBO estimates the cost to both public and private entities of complying with the reporting requirement would be small. MANDATES THAT APPLY TO PRIVATE ENTITIES ONLY The bill would impose several additional mandates on Amtrak. It would require the Amtrak Board of Directors to consider options to improve boarding procedures and to evaluate requests to use an Amtrak right-of-way for other business activities. The bill also would require Amtrak to establish certain financial controls and submit to the Congress various reports, including a report on options to enhance development around Amtrak stations. Finally, the bill would modify Amtrak’s role on certain rail advisory committees. CBO estimates that the aggregate cost of complying with those mandates would be small. OTHER EFFECTS Other provisions of the bill would benefit states by authorizing grants to improve intercity rail passenger service. CBO estimates states would receive about $945 million over the 2015–2019 period, and any costs would be incurred voluntarily as a condition of federal assistance. Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: Sarah Puro; Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Melissa Merrell; Impact on the Private Sector: Amy Petz. Estimate approved by: Theresa Gullo, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 9 PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the performance goals and objectives of this legislation are to authorize passenger rail programs administered by the Federal Railroad Administration, including the operating and capital funding for Amtrak and the intercity passenger rail grants, and reform Amtrak’s operations, budgeting, and planning. The bill also allows for more private sector participation in stations, rights-of-way, and passenger rail operations. Finally, H.R. 5449 makes further changes to intercity passenger rail policy, improving the administration of the rail grant programs, rail loan programs, and the delivery process for rail projects. ADVISORY OF EARMARKS Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee is required to include a list of congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in clause 9(e), 9(f), and 9(g) of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives. No provision in the bill includes an earmark, limited tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit under clause 9(e), 9(f), or 9(g) of rule XXI. DUPLICATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Pursuant to section 3(j) of H. Res. 5, 113th Cong. (2013), the Committee finds that no provision of H.R. 5449 establishes or reauthorizes a program of the federal government known to be duplicative of another federal program, a program that was included in any report from the Government Accountability Office to Congress pursuant to section 21 of Public Law 111–139, or a program related to a program identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. DISCLOSURE OF DIRECTED RULE MAKINGS Pursuant to section 3(k) of H. Res. 5, 113th Cong. (2013), the Committee estimates that enacting H.R. 5449 specifically directs the completion of a specific rule making within the meaning of section 551 of title 5, United States Code. Section 401 of H.R. 5449 requires the Secretary of Transportation to carry out a rulemaking regarding environmental streamlining of railroad projects. FEDERAL MANDATE STATEMENT The Committee adopts as its own the estimate of federal mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Public Law 104–4). PREEMPTION CLARIFICATION Section 423 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires the report of any Committee on a bill or joint resolution to include a statement on the extent to which the bill or joint resolution is intended to preempt state, local, or tribal law. The Committee states emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 10 that H.R. 5449 does not preempt any state, local, or tribal law. H.R. 5449 preserves the rights and permitting authorities of states. ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT Section 203 of this legislation establishes an advisory committee, as defined by section 2 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app.). Pursuant to section 5 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Committee determines that the functions of this advisory committee are not being carried out by existing agencies or advisory commissions. The Committee also determines that the advisory committee has a clearly defined purpose, fairly balanced membership, and meets all of the other requirements of section 5(b) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. APPLICABILITY OF LEGISLATIVE BRANCH The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to the terms and conditions of employment or access to public services or accommodations within the meaning of section 102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act (Public Law 104–1). SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATION TITLE I—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS Section 101. Authorization for Amtrak system Fiscal responsibility is a top priority for the Committee. For decades authorization bills have included unrealistic funding levels. PRRIA breaks this cycle by authorizing Amtrak at fiscally responsible, recently appropriated funding levels. This section authorizes funds to be appropriated for fiscal years 2015 through 2018 to the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (Secretary) for the use of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) for capital projects, operating grants, debt service payments, and other activities. However, instead of separate authorizations for capital and debt service and for operating grants, subsection 101(a) authorizes funding to be appropriated to a new Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account, for capital projects and debt service payments related to the corridor, and subsection 101(b) authorizes funding to be appropriated to a new National Network account for the capital and operating expenses of state-supported and long-distance routes, and for debt service payments related to those services. Subsection 101(c) allows the Secretary to withhold up to one half of one percent of the funds authorized in this section for oversight purposes. The authorization structure contained in this section will ensure transparency in the federal funding requirements for Amtrak. Section 102. Authorization for Amtrak Office of Inspector General This section authorizes funds to be appropriated for fiscal years 2015 through 2018 to the Secretary for the Office of Inspector General of Amtrak to conduct oversight of Amtrak’s operations and management. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 11 Section 103. National Infrastructure Investments This section authorizes funds to be appropriated for fiscal years 2015 through 2018 to the Secretary for capital grants for intercity passenger rail projects as authorized under Chapter 244 of Title 49, United States Code. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated, 50 percent of funds shall be used for a Federal-State Partnership for Northeast Corridor Rehabilitation and Improvement program established under section 301 of this Act. Section 104. Northeast Corridor This section clarifies, for the purposes of this title, that the Northeast Corridor is defined as the main line between Boston, Massachusetts and Washington, District of Columbia, and the facilities and services necessary to operate and maintain that line. TITLE II—AMTRAK REFORM Section 201. Amtrak reform This section amends chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, by adding at the end the following new sections: Section 24317. Costs and revenues With the move to a lines-of-business approach for authorizing federal support for Amtrak, all costs and revenues of the company must be allocated to the newly created accounts. This new section requires Amtrak to establish and maintain internal controls to ensure that all costs and revenues are allocated to either the NEC or National Network account. Section 24318. Grant process This new section lays out the procedures Amtrak shall follow when preparing and submitting to the Secretary and Congress a request for federal grants. It also sets forth the contents of such grant requests, including a detailed financial analysis by lines of business, a description of the work to be funded along with cost estimates and a timetable for completion of projects supported by the federal funds, and other information similar in nature to budget requests of executive agencies of the federal government. The Committee believes the grant process and contents need to better justify federal support and give the taxpayers and Congress a more transparent understanding of the federal funds being invested, so that informed decisions can be made on the amount of federal funding provided each year. This new section also outlines the review and approval process for grant requests and the payment schedule for the Secretary to obligate and outlay funds to Amtrak. Section 24319. Accounts Due to the shift to a lines-of-business approach to authorizations, this new section requires Amtrak to establish two accounts, the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account and the National Network account. It mandates that all federal grant funds, compensation received from states pursuant to sections 209 and 212 of Division B of Public Law 110–432, and operating surpluses shall be allocated between the two accounts. The establishment of these two accounts eliminates the need to cross-subsidize Amtrak’s lines of emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 12 business, though the section does include a transfer mechanism via notification to the Amtrak Board of Directors. Establishing these accounts ensures that profits generated on the NEC, and state access payments for use of the NEC, are reinvested on the corridor. Similarly, state payments, federal appropriations, and revenue generated on the National Network will go towards activities supported by that account. The Committee is concerned that Amtrak’s current structure is not transparent or aligned by core services. Establishing separate accounts and only allowing funds to be transferred between the accounts following Amtrak notification and justification to the Amtrak Board of Directors will significantly increase transparency and accountability. Subsection (e) also requires the Secretary to issue letters of intent to obligate future year budget authority for major capital projects requiring multi-year funding to enhance certainty that the project will reach completion. Finally, the Committee is concerned about Amtrak’s history with procurements, including problems with the Acela fleet procurement and lack of funding to complete an ongoing purchase of sleeping and baggage cars. While the company has made progress on planning, it has been inconsistent with carrying out business cases for major procurements, even when it relies upon federal funding to make such purchases. PRRIA addresses this problem by mandating that Amtrak conduct a business case prior to entering into any large capital acquisition. Specifically, Amtrak must submit a business case to the Secretary and Congress for rolling stock purchases in excess of $100,000,000 that sets forth the costs and benefits of the procurement, the total payments by fiscal year, the source of the funding, whether the purchase will increase the need for federal funding, and contingency plans if there is no funding available for the purchase. This subsection is intended to improve Amtrak’s business planning while giving Congress and the public confidence that Amtrak is exercising effective stewardship of federal funds. Section 24906. Northeast corridor planning The NEC is a valuable transportation asset to the region and nation as a whole. It is also one of the world’s most complicated railroad corridors, with roughly 200 daily Amtrak trains and nearly 1,800 daily commuter and freight trains. The last rail reauthorization created the Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission (NEC Commission) to act as the regional body to coordinate activities, and also required states to start contributing funds to keep maintaining the corridor. PRRIA significantly advances these efforts by empowering the NEC Commission to act as a true planner and convener of the states, commuter railroads, and Amtrak. This enhanced governance regime will allow states to have an equal voice in the management of the corridor, and will ensure that all investments are coordinated appropriately among the infrastructure owners and users. Specifically, this section charges the NEC Commission to work in conjunction with Amtrak, the FRA, and the states to develop and implement a five-year NEC Capital Investment Plan in order to identify, prioritize, and phase projects needed to improve the NEC. This plan then becomes the basis upon which investments in the NEC must be made by Amtrak. Also, for projects to be eligible for emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 13 both the Federal-State Partnership for NEC Development and Improvement grants established in section 301 and for the NEC Fast Forward RRIF loan set-aside established in section 303, the project must be included in the NEC Capital Investment Plan. This section also requires Amtrak, states, and public transportation entities that own infrastructure or operate service on the NEC to develop and submit to the NEC Commission NEC Asset Management Plans within 12 months of the enactment of the Act. Once developed, these asset plans will be used to inform the development of the NEC Capital Investment Plan. Furthermore, recognizing that the FRA is currently conducting a Service Development Plan for the NEC as part of its NEC FUTURE study, the NEC Commission is required to update that NEC Service Development Plan every 10 years. This will allow for an evaluation of service goals as ridership, revenues, and service levels evolve over the years. Section 202. Five-Year capital and operating plan PRRIA requires greater transparency into Amtrak’s accounting. Amtrak must provide detailed information to states on costs for their services. Furthermore, Amtrak is required to complete detailed five-year capital and financial plans, with annual explanations of how it met its prior year’s goals. This will help Congress, states, and the taxpayer better understand and evaluate its returnon-investment in Amtrak. This section requires the Amtrak Board of Directors to prepare five-year capital and operating plans for the NEC and the National Network within 60 days of an act appropriating funds to Amtrak. To ensure that the states are properly involved in Amtrak’s decision-making regarding their services, the plan must be done in consultation with the NEC Commission for NEC planning and the states for National Network planning. Following the lines-of-business approach and to ensure that Congress is properly informed, this section identifies the specific information to be contained in the plans, including forecasts and projects, by each line of business. Also, this section requires Amtrak to plan based on real, constrained funding levels, not overly optimistic targets that will never materialize, by making the plans conform to authorized funding levels so that Congress is provided with realistic expectations of what can be achieved given the actual federal funds. Finally, this section requires that Amtrak update Congress on its progress monthly to maintain accountability throughout the year. Section 203. State-supported routes State-supported routes account for nearly half of Amtrak’s total ridership. While ridership has been successful, a patchwork of financial arrangements had developed between Amtrak and the states with varying levels of support. Given this inconsistent approach, Section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA 2008) required Amtrak to work with the states to develop and implement a single, nationwide standardized methodology for establishing and allocating the costs of providing intercity rail service on state-supported routes. While most states have begun to pay for their state supported routes on an equal basis, states have raised concerns that Amtrak’s financial data is emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 14 not transparent enough to know exactly what the underlying costs are for. At the same time, the Committee is concerned that some states are not paying Amtrak for services as required under section 209, and urges such states to take action to pay for such services. The section seeks to remedy these issues by requiring the Secretary to establish a State-Supported Route Advisory Committee made up of Amtrak, the Department of Transportation and the FRA, and seven states that sponsor state-supported routes, to promote cooperation and planning along the routes pursuant to section 209 of PRIIA 2008. Amtrak will also be required to regularly submit detailed financial and performance information to the states. This will help to enhance transparency and accountability toward the states paying for the service. Finally, this section creates an expedited dispute resolution process with the Surface Transportation Board functioning as the final arbiter. Section 204. Route and service planning Amtrak operates 15 long-distance trains over an 18,500 mile network serving 39 states, utilizing privately-owned freight rail track. PRIIA 2008 included several provisions to try to improve performance and reduce operating losses on these routes; however, no action on these provisions has been taken by the FRA. To ensure action is taken, this section requires Amtrak, not the FRA, to contract with a third party entity to develop and recommend objective methodologies for Amtrak to use in evaluating what intercity passenger routes and services it will provide, including creation of new routes, elimination of existing routes, or other changes to improve service. Recommendations must be submitted to Congress, and the Amtrak Board of Directors is required to consider adoption of such recommendations and then explain to Congress its reasoning for adopting or not adopting those recommendations. Section 205. Competition Throughout the 113th Congress, with other modes becoming more congested, private providers of passenger rail have expressed interest in developing new services. Indeed, several projects are underway for private companies to build and operate their own passenger rail lines in a couple of states. The Committee takes advantage of this rail renaissance and interest in passenger rail provision, by establishing an alternative passenger rail pilot program to encourage competition along certain Amtrak routes. Within our free market economic construct, competition can generate better efficiencies and improved services for the customer. Under the pilot program established here, rail carriers would submit bids to FRA, who would award the winning bidder the right and obligation to provide rail service over that route, as well as access to Amtrak’s reservation system, stations, and facilities as long as the company maintains minimum FRA standards. In addition, the winning bidder may only receive 90 percent or less of the prior year’s Amtrak cost. This section grants FRA the authority to transfer a defined portion of Amtrak’s appropriation for that specific route to operate the alternative service. It also requires, no later than 1 year after the enactment of the Act, the FRA to issue a rulemaking to develop the pilot program. Finally, not later than 1 year after the concluVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 15 sion of the program, the FRA must submit the results of the pilot program to Congress. Section 206. Food and beverage reform For decades Amtrak has operated its food and beverage service at a loss. PRRIA addresses this problem by requiring that Amtrak implement a series of reforms to eliminate food and beverage losses in five years, which may include improved product and supply chain efficiencies; strengthened training and accountability for staff; improved scheduling of food and beverage staff; and ticket revenue enhancements. This section requires that within five years of enactment of the Act, the operating loss associated with providing food and beverage service on board trains will be eliminated. The section also includes language protecting Amtrak’s existing workforce, but also mandates that after the five year period, no federal funding may be utilized to cover food and beverage losses. Section 207. Right-of-way leveraging Amtrak owns the majority of the NEC, which passes through some of the most densely populated areas of the country. The company also controls several other rail lines around the Nation. These railroad rights-of-way represent an untapped opportunity to partner with the private sector to generate additional non-passenger rail service revenue. Additional revenue would help reduce the need of federal funding and allow more private investment for passenger rail. This section requires Amtrak to issue a Request for Proposals seeking private sector entities to utilize Amtrak-owned right-of-way for telecom systems, energy distribution systems, and other activities. The Amtrak Board of Directors is required to review each proposal, and no later than 18 months after the enactment of this Act must submit to Congress a summary of each proposal received as well as any proposals accepted. Section 208. Station development Rail stations are often located in desirable downtown locations and can become focal points for significant residential, commercial, and retail development, and enhance transportation options in communities. For example, Denver undertook a half a billion dollar project to develop a commuter and intercity rail terminal, a regional bus facility, new light rail platforms, and improved public spaces, surrounded by significant private real estate development. Amtrak owns many of these stations, but leveraging their potential for real estate and other development and enhancement has been a low priority. The Committee urges Amtrak, among other proposals, to form partnerships that provide bike sharing programs and dedicated bike parking areas with lighting and accessibility in its stations to help enhance seamless transportation connections and grow ridership. This section requires Amtrak to transmit to Congress a report on options to enhance development around Amtrak stations not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act. Development proposals should strengthen multimodal connections, capture developmentrelated revenue streams, and pursue opportunities to better leverVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 16 age station assets. Doing so will generate more revenue to that line of business within Amtrak which can be used to improve infrastructure. Section 209. Amtrak debt This section reauthorizes section 205 of PRIIA 2008 to restructure Amtrak’s debt. Ten years ago, Amtrak’s debt reached $3.7 billion. PRIIA 2008 provided authority for restructuring Amtrak’s debt which reduced its debt to $1.4 billion in just six short years. The Committee made technical changes to the bill that was ordered reported to address concerns raised by the Congressional Budget Office. These revisions were made pursuant to the unanimous consent agreement offered by the Chairman and agreed to by the Committee at the markup to permit the Chairman, after consultation with the Ranking Member, to strike or revise any provisions of any of the bills ordered reported that would cause the bill to be subject to a Budget Act or Rule 21 Cut-Go point of order. Section 210. Amtrak pilot program for passengers transporting domesticated cats and dogs This section requires Amtrak to develop and implement a pilot program to allow domesticated cats and dogs to travel on a specifically designated railcar. The animal must be in a kennel sized in accordance to Amtrak’s requirements for carry-on baggage. The passenger will pay a fee that, in the aggregate, covers the full costs of the pilot program. Section 211. Amtrak boarding procedures One of the benefits of intercity passenger rail is the ability to quickly board a train, from train stations centrally located in cities, as opposed to the airports, which are often located far from downtowns, and which require passengers to arrive much earlier before a departure time. However, Amtrak is not fully leveraging this competitive advantage and has seemingly cumbersome boarding procedures at some of its largest stations. This section requires the Amtrak Inspector General to conduct a study comparing Amtrak boarding procedures at its 10 busiest stations to other rail boarding procedures, and make recommendations to the Amtrak Board of Directors to improve such procedures. Within six months of receiving the recommendations, the Board shall consider each recommendation for implementation. TITLE III—INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL POLICY Section 301. Federal-state partnership for NEC development and improvement The NEC is an incredibly valuable asset to both the region and the Nation, and it should be treated as such. Capital improvements are necessary to bring the corridor into a state of good repair and increase service reliability. The NEC also acts as a valuable resource for states along the corridor. Of the nearly 2,000 trains that traverse the corridor daily, roughly 1,800 of them are commuter trains, not owned by Amtrak. This joint use highlights the need for greater reliability and efficiency, and presents opportunities for partnerships with states to improve this asset for all users. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 17 This section establishes a program under Chapter 244 of Title 49, United States Code, for issuing grants on a competitive basis for the purpose of financing capital projects included in the Northeast Corridor Priority Project List. The list is required to include projects to improve the state of good repair of existing assets, and projects to improve intercity passenger rail performance through increased reliability, reduced trip times, and other improvements. Finally, states are required to equally match the funding provided by this Act, and the FRA is not authorized to obligate federal funds until the state match is guaranteed. Section 302: RRIF process improvements The FRA administers the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) program, which provides long-term, low-interest loans for railroad-related improvements. While this program is authorized to provide up to $35 billion in lending, nearly all of it remains unused. This lack of uptake stems in part from FRA’s slow, cumbersome approval process. This section makes several improvements to the RRIF loan program, including limiting the Office of Management and Budget review period for loan approval and setting a 45-day timeframe for determining application completion. States are allowed more flexibility in determining collateral offered to secure loans and adds Positive Train Control projects to the list of projects given preference in the approval process. The section also includes an annual report to Congress on RRIF program activities. Section 303. NEC fast forward The RRIF program is one way the federal government can partner with the states and Amtrak to advance large infrastructure projects that are difficult to carry out with annual appropriations. In particular, the Northeast Corridor, with its proven passenger rail and commuter rail ridership, is an ideal area to use the RRIF program to address needed improvements. PRRIA dedicates a significant portion of the RRIF program to the NEC to incentivize states and localities to come to the table and seek loans to advance projects of national and regional significance. This section directs the Secretary, as part of the RRIF program, to provide direct loans and loan guarantees to eligible entities for capital projects to improve the NEC. It also requires the Government Accountability Office to submit a report to Congress identifying potential revenue sources, projects, and service improvements that could be achieved by RRIF capital improvements programs. This section also increases the comment period on certain waiver determinations from 15 to 30 days and requires the Secretary to submit an annual report on such waivers to Congress. Finally, it allows provisions used in FRA grant programs to be applied to the RRIF loan program. Section 304. Large capital project requirements This section prevents the Secretary from obligating a grant through the High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Programs in excess of $1 billion unless the applicant is able to demonstrate to the Secretary that the non-federal share is committed, the project will result in a useable segment, and the applicant submits certain emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 18 information to the Secretary on the project, including the project’s anticipated benefits. These provisions will ensure that the federal funding for the project is being used efficiently and effectively to achieve the intended goals of the program. Furthermore, it requires the Secretary to ensure that the project is maintained to the level of utility that is necessary to support the benefits approved by the Secretary for a period of 20 years from the date the project is placed in service. If the project is not maintained for a period of time in excess of 12 months, then a pro-rata share of the federal contribution shall be refunded. Section 305. Small business participation study This section requires the Secretary to conduct a nationwide disparity and availability study on the use of small business concerns owned and controlled by socially- and economically-disadvantaged individuals in publicly funded intercity passenger rail projects administered by the FRA. Section 306. Gulf Coast rail service working group This section requires the FRA to convene a working group to evaluate the restoration of intercity rail passenger service in the Gulf Coast Region between New Orleans, Louisiana and Orlando, Florida. Section 307. Miscellaneous This section amends Title 49, United States Code in order to make technical corrections. TITLE IV—PROJECT DELIVERY Section 401. Project delivery rulemaking PRIIA 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) changed FRA’s primary focus from being a safety agency to include being a major grant-maker. ARRA provided $8 billion in federal funding for High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail grants to states for various passenger rail projects. These projects require environmental reviews to comply with NEPA, yet the FRA still has no regulations on environmental review, only a Federal Register notice from May 1999 predating the addition of its substantial grant-making duties. However, prior transportation authorizations for other modal administrations within the DOT streamlined environmental review processes for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) leaving FRA’s processes several iterations behind these agencies. States have expressed concerns with this lack of guidance and about the discrepancies in the environmental review processes of the separate intermodal agencies, particularly when a project crosses multiple jurisdictions. Because environmental reviews of rail projects can require participation by multiple agencies, if participation in the process is done sequentially, a delay at one agency can have cascading dilatory effects throughout the process. Further, without deadlines, environmental reviews can be delayed simply because no agency action was taken. The bill addresses these concerns by requiring the emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 19 Secretary to issue a rulemaking to govern the environmental review, permitting, and approval or disapproval of freight railroad, intercity rail passenger, and certain commuter rail passenger infrastructure projects. The rulemaking is to include procedures for creating process efficiencies, such as conducting concurrent reviews, establishing deadlines for decisions, providing for improved agency coordination, and considering expanded categorical exclusions. Section 402. Historic preservation of railroads PRIIA 2008 mandated that the FRA study ways to streamline compliance with section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and section 303 of Title 49 for rail infrastructure projects. Concerns have been raised regarding, among other things, the length of time added to project reviews as a result of compliance with those laws and the lack of uniformity in how historic preservation reviews were conducted by the requisite entities for rail projects. The FRA submitted its report to Congress in March 2013 outlining the administrative and legislative actions that could be taken to reduce timelines and improve reviews. This section builds upon that report and requires the Secretary to pursue administrative program alternatives to promote a consistent approach to the treatment of railroads for historic preservation purposes, and to consider, among other options, the development of programmatic agreements, program comments, exempted categories of undertakings, and guidance for historical reviews. Further, the Secretary must develop mechanisms for streamlining compliance with the requirements of section 303 reviews for railroad and rail-related properties and shall consider, among other options, the development of programmatic evaluations, de minimis impact determinations, and regulatory guidance. TITLE V—MISCELLANEOUS Section 501. Definitions This section amends Title 49 to insert several definitions to conform to changes made elsewhere in the Act. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italic, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): TITLE 49, UNITED STATES CODE * * * * * * * SUBTITLE V—RAIL PROGRAMS * * * * * * * PART B—ASSISTANCE * * * * * * * emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 20 CHAPTER 221—LOCAL RAIL FREIGHT ASSISTANCE * * * * * * * § 22106. Limitations on financial assistance (a) * * * (b) STATE USE OF REPAID FUNDS AND CONTINGENT INTEREST RECOVERIES.—The State shall place the United States Government’s share of money that is repaid and any contingent interest that is recovered in an interest-bearing account. The repaid money, contingent interest, and any øinterest thereof¿ interest thereon shall be considered to be State funds. The State shall use such funds to make other grants and loans, consistent with the purposes for which financial assistance may be used under subsection (a), as the State considers to be appropriate. * * * * * * * PART C—PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION * * * * * * * CHAPTER 241—GENERAL § 24101. Findings, mission, and goals (a) * * * (b) MISSION.—The mission of Amtrak is to provide efficient and effective intercity passenger rail mobility consisting of high quality service that is trip-time competitive with other intercity travel options and that is consistent with the goals of øsubsection (d)¿ subsection (c). * * * * * * * § 24102. Definitions In this part— (1) * * * * * * * * * * (5) ‘‘long-distance route’’ means a route described in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (7). (6) ‘‘National Network’’ includes long-distance routes and State-supported routes. ø(5)¿ (7) ‘‘national rail passenger transportation system’’ means— (A) * * * * * * * * * * ø(6)¿ (8) ‘‘Northeast Corridor’’ means Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. ø(7)¿ (9) ‘‘rail carrier’’ means a person, including a unit of State or local government, providing rail transportation for compensation. ø(8)¿ (10) ‘‘rate’’ means a rate, fare, or charge for rail transportation. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 21 ø(9)¿ (11) ‘‘regional transportation authority’’ means an entity established to provide passenger transportation in a region. (12) ‘‘state-of-good-repair’’ means a condition in which physical assets, both individually and as a system, are— (A) performing at a level at least equal to that called for in their as-built or as-modified design specification during any period when the life cycle cost of maintaining the assets is lower than the cost of replacing them; and (B) sustained through regular maintenance and replacement programs. (13) ‘‘State-supported route’’ means a route described in subparagraph (B) or (D) of paragraph (7), or in section 24702, that is operated by Amtrak, excluding those trains operated by Amtrak on the routes described in paragraph (7)(A). * * * * * * * ø§ 24104. Authorization of appropriations ø(a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation— ø(1) $1,138,000,000 for fiscal year 1998; ø(2) $1,058,000,000 for fiscal year 1999; ø(3) $1,023,000,000 for fiscal year 2000; ø(4) $989,000,000 for fiscal year 2001; and ø(5) $955,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, for the benefit of Amtrak for capital expenditures under chapters 243, 247, and 249 of this title, operating expenses, and payments described in subsection (c)(1)(A) through (C). In fiscal years following the fifth anniversary of the enactment of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 no funds authorized for Amtrak shall be used for operating expenses other than those prescribed for tax liabilities under section 3221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that are more than the amount needed for benefits of individuals who retire from Amtrak and for their beneficiaries. ø(b) OPERATING EXPENSES.—(1) Not more than $381,000,000 may be appropriated to the Secretary for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1993, and September 30, 1994, for the benefit of Amtrak for operating expenses. Not more than 5 percent of the amounts appropriated for each fiscal year shall be used to pay operating expenses under section 24704 of this title for transportation in operation on September 30, 1992. ø(2)(A) Not more than the following amounts may be appropriated to the Secretary for the benefit of Amtrak for operating losses under section 24704 of this title for transportation beginning after September 30, 1992: ø(i) $7,500,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993. ø(ii) $9,500,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994. ø(B) The expenditure by Amtrak of an amount appropriated under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph is deemed not to be an operating expense when calculating the revenue-to-operating expense ratio of Amtrak. ø(c) MANDATORY PAYMENTS.—(1) Not more than $150,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and amounts that may emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 22 be necessary for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, may be appropriated to the Secretary to pay— ø(A) tax liabilities under section 3221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3221) due in those fiscal years that are more than the amount needed for benefits for individuals who retire from Amtrak and for their beneficiaries; ø(B) obligations of Amtrak under section 8(a) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. 358(a)) due in those fiscal years that are more than obligations of Amtrak calculated on an experience-related basis; and ø(C) obligations of Amtrak due under section 3321 of the Code (26 U.S.C. 3321). ø(2) Amounts appropriated under this subsection are not a United States Government subsidy of Amtrak. ø(d) PAYMENT TO AMTRAK.—Amounts appropriated under this section shall be paid to Amtrak under the budget request of the Secretary as approved or modified by Congress when the amounts are appropriated. A payment may not be made more frequently than once every 90 days, unless Amtrak, for good cause, requests more frequent payment before a 90-day period ends. In each fiscal year in which amounts are authorized to be appropriated under this section, amounts appropriated shall be paid to Amtrak as follows: ø(1) 50 percent on October 1. ø(2) 25 percent on January 1. ø(3) 25 percent on April 1. ø(e) AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS AND EARLY APPROPRIATIONS.—(1) Amounts appropriated under this section remain available until expended. ø(2) Amounts for capital acquisitions and improvements may be appropriated in a fiscal year before the fiscal year in which the amounts will be obligated. ø(f) LIMITATIONS ON USE.—Amounts appropriated under this section may not be used to subsidize operating losses of commuter rail passenger or rail freight transportation.¿ * * * * * * * CHAPTER 243—AMTRAK Sec. 24301. Status and applicable laws. * * * * * * * 24316. øPlan to assist¿ Plans to address needs of families of passengers involved in rail passenger accidents. 24317. Costs and revenues. 24318. Grant process. 24319. Accounts. 24320. 5-year budget and business plan. 24321. Food and beverage reform. * * * * * * * § 24317. Costs and revenues (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, Amtrak shall establish and maintain internal controls to ensure Amtrak’s costs and revenues are allocated to either the Northeast CorVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 23 ridor or the National Network, including proportional shares of common and fixed costs. (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this chapter, the term ‘‘Northeast Corridor’’ means the Northeast Corridor main line between Boston, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and facilities and services used to operate and maintain that line. § 24318. Grant process (a) PROCEDURES FOR GRANT REQUESTS.—Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish and transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate substantive and procedural requirements, including schedules, for grant requests under this section. (b) GRANT REQUESTS.—Amtrak shall transmit grant requests for Federal funds to be appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak to— (1) the Secretary; and (2) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate. (c) CONTENTS.—A grant request under subsection (b) shall— (1) provide a detailed financial analysis for the upcoming fiscal year for the Northeast Corridor, State-supported routes, and long-distance routes, including projections for the items listed in 24320(c)(1), as applicable, in comparison to prior fiscal year projections; (2) include a description of the work to be funded, along with cost estimates and an estimated timetable for completion of the projects covered by the request; (3) include an assessment of the continuing financial stability of Amtrak; (4) be displayed on Amtrak’s website within a reasonable timeframe following its submission to the entities described in subsection (b); and (5) be in similar format and substance to those submitted by executive agencies of the Federal Government. (d) REVIEW AND APPROVAL.— (1) 30-DAY APPROVAL PROCESS.—The Secretary shall complete the review of a grant request and approve or disapprove the request not later than 30 days after the date on which Amtrak submits the grant request. If the Secretary disapproves the request or determines that the request is incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall include the reason for disapproval or the incomplete items or deficiencies in a notice to Amtrak. (2) 15-DAY MODIFICATION PERIOD.—Not later than 15 days after receiving notification from the Secretary under paragraph (1), Amtrak shall submit a modified request for the Secretary’s review. (3) REVISED REQUESTS.—Not later than 15 days after receiving a modified request from Amtrak, the Secretary shall either emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 24 approve the modified request, or, if the Secretary finds that the request is still incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall identify in writing to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate the remaining deficiencies and recommend a process for resolving the outstanding portions of the request. (e) PAYMENT TO AMTRAK.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), in each fiscal year for which amounts are authorized to be appropriated, amounts appropriated shall be paid to Amtrak as follows: (A) 50 percent on October 1. (B) 25 percent on January 1. (C) 25 percent on April 1. (2) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary may make a payment to Amtrak of appropriated funds more frequently than once every 90 days if Amtrak, for good cause, requests more frequent payment before a 90-day period ends. (f) AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS AND EARLY APPROPRIATIONS.— Amounts appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak shall remain available until expended. Amounts for capital acquisitions and improvements may be appropriated for a fiscal year before the fiscal year in which the amounts will be obligated. (g) LIMITATIONS ON USE.—Amounts appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak may not be used to subsidize operating losses of commuter rail passenger or rail freight transportation. § 24319. Accounts (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNTS.—Amtrak shall establish— (1) a Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account; and (2) a National Network account. (b) NORTHEAST CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT FUND ACCOUNT.— (1) DEPOSITS.—Amtrak shall deposit in the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account established under subsection (a)(1)— (A) grant funds appropriated for the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund pursuant to section 101(a) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 or any subsequent Act; (B) compensation received from commuter rail passenger transportation on the Northeast Corridor provided to Amtrak pursuant to section 24905(c); and (C) any operating surplus of the Northeast Corridor, as allocated pursuant to section 24317. (2) USE OF NORTHEAST CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT FUND ACCOUNT.—Except as provided in subsection (d), amounts deposited in the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account shall be made available for the use of Amtrak for— (A) capital projects described in section 24401(2) (A) or (B) to bring the Northeast Corridor to a state-of-good-repair, including projects described in section 24906(a)(2)(E)(i)(I); emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 25 (B) capital projects intended to increase corridor capacity, improve service reliability, and reduce travel time for rail users on the Northeast Corridor, including projects described in subclauses (II) and (III) of section 24906(a)(2)(E)(i), consistent with the planning process established under section 24906; and (C) retirement of principal and payment of interest on loans for capital equipment, or capital leases, attributable to the Northeast Corridor. (c) NATIONAL NETWORK ACCOUNT.— (1) DEPOSITS.—Amtrak shall deposit in the account established under subsection (a)(2)— (A) grant funds appropriated for the National Network pursuant to section 101(b) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, or any subsequent Act; (B) compensation received from States provided to Amtrak pursuant to section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 24101 note); and (C) any operating surplus from the National Network, as allocated pursuant to section 24317. (2) USE OF NATIONAL NETWORK ACCOUNT.—Except as provided in subsection (d), amounts deposited in the National Network account shall be made available for the use of Amtrak for capital expenses and operating costs of the National Network and retirement of principal and payment of interest on loans for capital equipment, or capital leases, attributable to the National Network. (d) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.— (1) AUTHORITY.—Amtrak may transfer any funds appropriated pursuant to the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 or any other Act, or any surplus generated by operations, between the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund and National Network accounts upon the expiration of 60 days after Amtrak has notified the Amtrak Board of Directors of such transfer. (2) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the Amtrak Board of Directors receives notification from Amtrak under paragraph (1), the Board shall transmit a report to the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, that includes— (A) the amount of the transfer; and (B) a detailed explanation of the reason for the transfer, including effects on Amtrak services if no transfer were made. (e) LETTERS OF INTENT.— (1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall issue a letter of intent to Amtrak announcing an intention to obligate, for a major capital project described in subclauses (II) and (III) of section 24906(a)(2)(E)(i), an amount from future available budget authority specified in law that is not more than the amount stipulated as the financial participation of the Secretary in the project. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 26 (2) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—At least 30 days before issuing a letter under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall notify in writing the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, of the proposed letter. The Secretary shall include with the notification a copy of the proposed letter, the criteria used for selecting the project for a grant award, and a description of how the project meets criteria of this section. (3) CONTINGENT NATURE OF OBLIGATION OR COMMITMENT.— An obligation or administrative commitment may be made only when amounts are appropriated. The letter of intent shall state that the contingent commitment is not an obligation of the Federal Government, and is subject to the availability of appropriations under Federal law and to Federal laws in force or enacted after the date of the contingent commitment. (f) ROLLING STOCK PURCHASES.—Prior to entering into contracts in excess of $100,000,000 for rolling stock procurements, Amtrak shall submit a business case analysis to the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, on the utility of such purchase. This analysis shall— (1) include a cost and benefit comparison that describes the total lifecycle costs and the anticipated benefits related to revenue, operational efficiency, reliability, and other factors; (2) set forth the total payments by fiscal year; (3) identify the specific source and amounts of funding for each payment, including Federal funds, State funds, Amtrak profits, Federal, State, or private loans or loan guarantees, and other funding; (4) include whether any payment under the contract will increase Amtrak’s grant request, as required under section 24318, in that particular fiscal year; and (5) describe how Amtrak will adjust the procurement if future funding is not available. § 24320. 5-year capital and operating plan (a) PLAN.—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of an Act appropriating funds pursuant to section 101 of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, or any subsequent authorization of appropriations for the same purposes, the Amtrak Board of Directors shall prepare and transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate a 5-year capital and operating plan for the Northeast Corridor and National Network. (b) CONSULTATION.—Each such plan shall be prepared in consultation with— (1) the Federal Railroad Administration; (2) the Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission, with respect to the Northeast Corridor; and emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 27 (3) the requisite States, with respect to the National Network. (c) CONTENTS.—A plan prepared under this section shall— (1) for each of the Northeast Corridor and the National Network, include— (A) projected revenues and expenditures for the Northeast Corridor, State-supported routes, long-distance routes, and corporate development, including Federal and non-Federal funding sources; (B) projected ridership levels for the Northeast Corridor, State-supported routes, and long-distance routes; (C) projected capital and operational funding requirements necessary to maintain passenger service in order to accommodate predicted ridership levels and predicted sources of Federal and non-Federal funding; (D) projected capital and operating requirements, ridership, revenue, and expenditures for new passenger service operations or service expansions; (E) an assessment of the continuing financial stability of Amtrak, as indicated by factors including anticipated Federal funding of capital and operating costs, Amtrak’s ability to efficiently recruit, retain, and manage its workforce, and Amtrak’s ability to effectively provide passenger rail service; (F) estimates of long-term and short-term debt and associated principal and interest payments (both current and anticipated); (G) annual cash flow forecasts; (H) a statement describing methods of estimation and significant assumptions; (I) specific measures that demonstrate measurable improvement year over year in the financial results of Amtrak’s operations; (J) prior fiscal year and projected— (i) operating ratio, cash operating loss, and cash operating loss per passenger on a route, business line, and corporate basis; (ii) specific costs and savings estimates resulting from reform initiatives; (iii) productivity statistics on a route, business line, and corporate basis; and (iv) equipment reliability statistics; (K) capital and operating expenditures for anticipated security needs; and (L) a prioritization of capital expenditures by business line; and (2) reflect the Northeast Corridor planning, as applicable, and grant processes established under sections 24906 and 24318. (d) CONFORMANCE TO AUTHORIZED FUNDING LEVELS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), any financial projection for a fiscal year that is included in a plan prepared under this section shall be based on the amount of dedicated funding for such fiscal year. (2) ABSENCE OF APPROPRIATION.—In the absence of an appropriation of funds for such fiscal year, the projection shall be emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 28 based on the amount of funds authorized by law to be appropriated for that fiscal year, plus other dedicated funding. (3) DEDICATED FUNDING DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘dedicated funding’’ means any amounts appropriated for a fiscal year and any other funding sources, including revenues and other ancillary funding streams, for the Northeast Corridor or the National Network. (e) STANDARDS TO PROMOTE FINANCIAL STABILITY.—In preparing a plan under this section, the Board shall apply sound budgetary practices, including reducing costs and other expenditures, improving productivity, increasing revenues, or combinations of such practices. (f) UPDATES.—Amtrak shall provide monthly reports for the current fiscal year in electronic format to the Secretary and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate regarding the items described in subsection (c)(1), which shall include a description of the work completed to date, any differences from projections, and the reasons for such differences. § 24321. Food and beverage reform (a) PLAN.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, Amtrak shall develop and begin implementing a plan to eliminate, within 5 years of such date of enactment, the operating loss associated with providing food and beverage service on board Amtrak trains. (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In developing and implementing the plan, Amtrak shall consider a combination of cost management and revenue generation initiatives, including— (1) scheduling optimization; (2) on-board logistics; (3) product development and supply chain efficiency; (4) training, awards, and accountability; (5) technology enhancements and process improvements; and (6) ticket revenue allocation. (c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Amtrak shall ensure that no Amtrak employee holding a position as of the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 is involuntarily separated because of— (1) the development and implementation of the plan required under subsection (a); or (2) any other action taken by Amtrak to implement this section. (d) NO FEDERAL FUNDING FOR OPERATING LOSSES.—Beginning on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, no Federal funds may be used to cover any operating loss associated with providing food and beverage service on a route operated by Amtrak or an alternative passenger rail service provider that operates a route in lieu of Amtrak pursuant to section 24711. (e) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, and annually thereafter for 5 years, Amtrak shall transmit to the ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 29 mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing the plan developed pursuant to subsection (a) and a description of progress in the implementation of the plan. * * * * * * * CHAPTER 244—INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE CORRIDOR CAPITAL ASSISTANCE Sec. 24401. Definitions. * * * * * * * 24407. Federal-State partnership for Northeast Corridor rehabilitation and improvement. * * * * * * * § 24402. Capital investment grants to support intercity passenger rail service (a) * * * * * * * * * * (m) LARGE CAPITAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—For a grant awarded under this chapter for an amount in excess of $1,000,000,000, the following conditions shall apply: (A) The Secretary of Transportation shall not obligate any funding unless the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that it has committed and will be able to fulfill the non-Federal share required for the grant within the applicant’s proposed project completion timetable. (B) The Secretary shall not obligate any funding for work activities that occur after the completion of final design unless— (i) the applicant transmits to the Secretary a financial plan that generally identifies the sources of the non-Federal funding required for any subsequent segments or phases of the corridor service development program covering the project for which the grant is made; (ii) the grant will result in a useable segment, a transportation facility, or equipment, that has operational independence; and (iii) the intercity passenger rail benefits anticipated to result from the grant, such as increased speed, improved on-time performance, reduced trip time, increased frequencies, new service, safety improvements, improved accessibility, or other significant enhancements are detailed by the grantee and approved by the Secretary. (C) The Secretary shall ensure that the project is maintained to the level of utility that is necessary to support the benefits approved under subparagraph (B)(iii) for a period of 20 years from the date the useable segment, transporVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 30 tation facility, or equipment described in subparagraph (B)(ii) is placed in service. If the project property is not maintained as required by this subparagraph for a period of time in excess of 12 months, then a pro-rata share of the Federal contribution, based upon the percentage remaining of the 20-year period that commenced when the project property was placed in service, shall be refunded. (2) EARLY WORK.—The Secretary may allow a grantee subject to this subsection to engage in at-risk work activities subsequent to the conclusion of final design where the Secretary determines that such work activities are reasonable and necessary. * * * * * * * § 24405. Grant conditions (a) BUY AMERICA.—(1) * * * * * * * * * * (4) If the Secretary determines that it is necessary to waive the application of paragraph (1) based on a finding under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall, before the date on which such finding takes effect— (A) * * * (B) provide notice of such finding and an opportunity for public comment on such finding for a reasonable period of time not to exceed ø15 days¿ 30 days. * * * * * * * (12) Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report listing any waiver issued under this section during the preceding year. * * * * * * * § 24407. Federal-State partnership for Northeast Corridor rehabilitation and improvement (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation shall develop and implement a program for issuing grants to applicants, on a competitive basis, for the purpose of financing the capital projects included in the Northeast Corridor Priority Project List developed under subsection (c). (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following definitions apply: (1) APPLICANT.—The term ‘‘applicant’’ means a State (including the District of Columbia), a group of States, an Interstate Compact, or a public agency established by one or more States and having responsibility for providing intercity passenger or commuter rail service. (2) MAJOR STATE-OF-GOOD-REPAIR PROJECT.—The term ‘‘major state-of-good-repair project’’ means a capital project primarily intended to replace, rehabilitate or repair major Northeast Corridor infrastructure assets utilized for providing intercity rail passenger transportation, including tunnels, bridges, stations, and other assets as determined by the Secretary. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 31 (3) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.—The term ‘‘improvement project’’ means a capital project primarily intended to improve intercity passenger rail performance on the Northeast Corridor, including reduced trip times, increased train frequencies, higher operating speeds, and other improvements as determined by the Secretary. (c) NORTHEAST CORRIDOR PRIORITY PROJECT LIST.—The Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission, established under section 24905, shall develop and approve a Northeast Corridor Priority Project List that shall include— (1) a list of prioritized individual major state-of-good-repair projects and improvement projects along the Northeast Corridor that— (A) can be completed based on— (i) the funding authorized under section 103(b) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014; (ii) any subsequent applicable authorization in effect; (iii) in the absence of such an authorization, a 5-year funding amount based on the most recent appropriation; or (iv) the requirements of subsection (d); and (B) are consistent with the Northeast Corridor capital investment plan required under section 24906(a); (2) an identification of the applicant for each individual project; (3) an identification of the sources of non-Federal matching funds for each project; and (4) a description of the benefits each project will bring to intercity rail passenger services. (d) USE OF FUNDS.—The Federal grants authorized under this section shall be for no more than 50 percent of the net project cost of the project involved. (e) APPLICABILITY OF CAPITAL GRANT REQUIREMENTS.—Except as specifically provided in this section, the use of any amounts appropriated for grants under this section shall be subject to the requirements of this chapter. (f) MATCH REQUIREMENTS.—No grants may be obligated to an applicant under this section unless the applicant has transmitted to the Secretary of Transportation a binding written commitment to provide all amounts necessary for the purpose of matching Federal contributions as required by this section. (g) UPDATES TO LIST.—The Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission shall revise the NEC Priority Project List as necessary to reflect— (1) any differences in the availability of Federal funding from the levels assumed for purposes of subsection (c)(1)(A) (i) and (ii); (2) any elimination or addition of projects; and (3) any reduction or increase in benefits to be derived from a project. (h) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts appropriated for carrying out this section shall remain available until expended. (i) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this section shall supplant the requirement of applicants to compensate Amtrak for the use of Amtrak facilities or services pursuant to section 24905(c). emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 32 (j) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘Northeast Corridor’’ means the Northeast Corridor main line between Boston, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and the Northeast Corridor branch lines connecting to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Springfield, Massachusetts, and Spuyten Duyvil, New York, and facilities and services used to operate and maintain those lines. * * * * * * * CHAPTER 247—AMTRAK ROUTE SYSTEM Sec. 24701. National rail passenger transportation system. * * * * * * * 24712. State-supported routes. * * * * * * * § 24706. Discontinuance (a) NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE.—(1) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, at least 180 days before øa discontinuance under section 24704 or or¿ discontinuing service over a route, Amtrak shall give notice of the discontinuance in the way Amtrak decides will give a State, a regional or local authority, or another person the opportunity to agree to share or assume the cost of any part of the train, route, or service to be discontinued. (2) Notice of the discontinuance under øsection 24704 or¿ paragraph (1) shall be posted in all stations served by the train to be discontinued at least 14 days before the discontinuance. (b) DISCONTINUANCE FOR LACK OF APPROPRIATIONS.—(1) Amtrak may discontinue service under øsection 24704 or¿ subsection (a)(1) during— (A) * * * * * * * * * * ø§ 24711. Alternate passenger rail service pilot program ø(a) IN GENERAL.—Within 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008, the Federal Railroad Administration shall complete a rulemaking proceeding to develop a pilot program that— ø(1) permits a rail carrier or rail carriers that own infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a passenger rail service route described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of section 24102(5)or in section 24702 to petition the Administration to be considered as a passenger rail service provider over that route in lieu of Amtrak for a period not to exceed 5 years after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008; ø(2) requires the Administration to notify Amtrak within 30 days after receiving a petition under paragraph (1) and establish a deadline by which both the petitioner and Amtrak would be required to submit a bid to provide passenger rail service over the route to which the petition relates; ø(3) requires that each bid describe how the bidder would operate the route, what Amtrak passenger equipment would be emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 33 needed, if any, what sources of non-Federal funding the bidder would use, including any State subsidy, among other things; ø(4) requires the Administration to select winning bidders by evaluating the bids against the financial and performance metrics developed under section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 and to give preference in awarding contracts to bidders seeking to operate routes that have been identified as one of the five worst performing Amtrak routes under section 24710; ø(5) requires the Administration to execute a contract within a specified, limited time after the deadline established under paragraph (2) and award to the winning bidder— ø(A) the right and obligation to provide passenger rail service over that route subject to such performance standards as the Administration may require, consistent with the standards developed under section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008; and ø(B) an operating subsidy— ø(i) for the first year at a level not in excess of the level in effect during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which the petition was received, adjusted for inflation; ø(ii) for any subsequent years at such level, adjusted for inflation; and ø(6) requires that each bid contain a staffing plan describing the number of employees needed to operate the service, the job assignments and requirements, and the terms of work for prospective and current employees of the bidder for the service outlined in the bid, and such staffing plan be made available by the winning bidder to the public after the bid award. ø(b) ROUTE LIMITATIONS.—The Administration may not make the program available with respect to more than 2 Amtrak intercity passenger rail routes. ø(c) PERFORMANCE STANDARDS; ACCESS TO FACILITIES; EMPLOYEES.—If the Administration awards the right and obligation to provide passenger rail service over a route under the program to a rail carrier or rail carriers— ø(1) it shall execute a contract with the rail carrier or rail carriers for rail passenger operations on that route that conditions the operating and subsidy rights upon— ø(A) the service provider continuing to provide passenger rail service on the route that is no less frequent, nor over a shorter distance, than Amtrak provided on that route before the award; and ø(B) the service provider’s compliance with the minimum standards established under section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 and such additional performance standards as the Administration may establish; ø(2) it shall, if the award is made to a rail carrier other than Amtrak, require Amtrak to provide access to its reservation system, stations, and facilities directly related to operations to any rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a contract under this section, in accordance with section 217 of that Act, necessary to carry out the purposes of this section; emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 34 ø(3) the employees of any person used by a rail carrier or rail carriers (as defined in section 10102(5) of this title) in the operation of a route under this section shall be considered an employee of that carrier or carriers and subject to the applicable Federal laws and regulations governing similar crafts or classes of employees of Amtrak, including provisions under section 121 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 relating to employees that provide food and beverage service; and ø(4) the winning bidder shall provide hiring preference to qualified Amtrak employees displaced by the award of the bid, consistent with the staffing plan submitted by the bidder and shall be subject to the grant conditions under section 24405 of this title. ø(d) CESSATION OF SERVICE.—If a rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a route under this section cease to operate the service or fail to fulfill their obligations under the contract required under subsection (c), the Administrator, in collaboration with the Surface Transportation Board, shall take any necessary action consistent with this title to enforce the contract and ensure the continued provision of service, including the installment of an interim service provider and re-bidding the contract to operate the service. The entity providing service shall either be Amtrak or a rail carrier defined in subsection (a)(1). ø(e) ADEQUATE RESOURCES.—Before taking any action allowed under this section, the Secretary shall certify that the Administrator has sufficient resources that are adequate to undertake the program established under this section.¿ § 24711. Alternate passenger rail service pilot program (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, the Federal Railroad Administration shall complete a rulemaking proceeding to develop a pilot program that— (1) permits a rail carrier or rail carriers that own infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a passenger rail service route described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of section 24102(5) or in section 24702(a) to petition the Federal Railroad Administration to be considered as a passenger rail service provider over that route in lieu of Amtrak for an operations period of 5 years; (2) requires the Federal Railroad Administration to notify Amtrak within 30 days after receiving a petition under paragraph (1) and establish a deadline by which both the petitioner and Amtrak would be required to submit a bid to provide passenger rail service over the route to which the petition relates; (3) requires that each bid describe how the bidder would operate the route, what Amtrak passenger equipment would be needed, if any, and what sources of non-Federal funding the bidder would use, including any State subsidy, among other things; (4) requires the Federal Railroad Administration to execute a contract within a specified, limited time after the deadline established under paragraph (2) and award to the winning bidder— emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 35 (A) the right and obligation to provide passenger rail service over that route subject to such performance standards as the Federal Railroad Administration may require; and (B) an operating subsidy— (i) for the first year at a level not in excess of 90 percent of the level in effect for that specific route during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which the petition was received, adjusted for inflation; and (ii) for any subsequent years at the level calculated under clause (i), adjusted for inflation; and (5) requires that each bid contain a staffing plan describing the number of employees needed to operate the service, the job assignments and requirements, and the terms of work for prospective and current employees of the bidder for the service outlined in the bid, and that such staffing plan be made available by the winning bidder to the public after the bid award. (b) ROUTE LIMITATIONS.—The Federal Railroad Administration may not make the program available with respect to more than 2 Amtrak intercity passenger rail routes. (c) PERFORMANCE STANDARDS; ACCESS TO FACILITIES; EMPLOYEES.—If the Federal Railroad Administration awards the right and obligation to provide passenger rail service over a route under this section to a rail carrier or rail carriers— (1) it shall execute a contract with the rail carrier or rail carriers for rail passenger operations on that route that conditions the operating and subsidy rights on— (A) the service provider continuing to provide passenger rail service on the route that is no less frequent, nor over a shorter distance, than Amtrak provided on that route before the award; and (B) the service provider’s compliance with the standards established under subsection (a)(4)(A), and such additional performance standards as the Administration may establish; (2) it shall, if the award is made to a rail carrier other than Amtrak, require Amtrak to provide access to its reservation system, stations, and facilities directly related to operations to any rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a contract under this section, in accordance with subsection (d), necessary to carry out the purposes of this section; (3) an employee of any person used by such rail carrier or rail carriers in the operation of a route under this section shall be considered an employee of that carrier or carriers and subject to the applicable Federal laws and regulations governing similar crafts or classes of employees of Amtrak, including provisions under section 121 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 (49 U.S.C. 4312 note) relating to employees that provide food and beverage service; and (4) the winning bidder shall provide hiring preference to qualified Amtrak employees displaced by the award of the bid, consistent with the staffing plan submitted by the bidder, and shall be subject to the grant conditions under section 24405 of this title. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 36 (d) DISPUTES.—If Amtrak and the rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a route under this section cannot agree upon terms to carry out subsection (c)(2), and the Surface Transportation Board finds that access to Amtrak’s facilities or equipment, or the provision of services by Amtrak, is necessary to carry out subsection (c)(2) and that the operation of Amtrak’s other services will not be impaired thereby, the Surface Transportation Board shall, within 120 days after submission of the dispute, issue an order that the facilities and equipment be made available, and that services be provided, by Amtrak, and shall determine reasonable compensation, liability, and other terms for use of the facilities and equipment and provision of the services. (e) CESSATION OF SERVICE.—If a rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a route under this section cease to operate the service or fail to fulfill their obligations under the contract required under subsection (c), the Federal Railroad Administration, in collaboration with the Surface Transportation Board, shall take any necessary action consistent with this title to enforce the contract and ensure the continued provision of service, including the installment of an interim service provider and rebidding the contract to operate the service. The entity providing service shall either be Amtrak or a rail carrier defined in subsection (a)(1). (f) ADEQUATE RESOURCES.—Before taking any action allowed under this section, the Secretary shall certify that the Federal Railroad Administration has sufficient resources appropriated under section 101(b) of Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, or any subsequent appropriation, for that purpose that are adequate to undertake the program established under this section. (g) BUDGET AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Transportation may provide to a winning bidder selected under this section appropriations authorized under sections 101(b) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, or any subsequent appropriation for the same purposes, necessary to cover the operating subsidy described in subsection (a)(4)(B). § 24712. State-supported routes (a) STATE-SUPPORTED ROUTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE.— (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a StateSupported Route Advisory Committee to promote mutual cooperation and planning pertaining to the rail operations and related activities of trains operated on State-supported routes and to further implement section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note). (2) MEMBERSHIP.—The Committee shall consist of representatives of— (A) Amtrak; (B) the Department of Transportation, including the Federal Railroad Administration; and (C) 7 States that sponsor State-supported routes, selected by the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration on the basis of appropriate expertise and geographic balance, and in a manner that ensures that all appropriate States are represented periodically on the Committee. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 37 (3) DISTRIBUTION OF MEMBERSHIP.—The membership belonging to any of the groups described in each individual subparagraph of paragraph (2) shall not constitute a majority of the Committee’s memberships. (4) MEETINGS; RULES AND PROCEDURES.—The Committee shall establish a schedule and location for convening meetings, but shall meet no less than 2 times every fiscal year. The Committee shall develop rules and procedures to govern the Committee’s proceedings. (b) COST, SERVICE, AND RIDERSHIP FORECASTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 31, 2015, and annually thereafter, Amtrak shall transmit to each State that sponsors a State-supported route, and to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate— (A) a final statement of costs, revenues, ridership, and other information determined appropriate by the Committee established under subsection (a), pertaining to each such route for the prior fiscal year; and (B) a cost, service, and ridership forecast for each such route for the upcoming fiscal year, developed pursuant to the methodology established under section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note). (2) EXCEPTION.—The Committee may establish a different deadline than is required under paragraph (1) for submission of final financial statements and cost, service, and ridership forecasts. (3) QUARTERLY UPDATES.—Beginning in 2015, and each year thereafter, Amtrak shall transmit to each State that sponsors a State-supported route quarterly updates of the cost, service, and ridership forecast described in paragraph (1)(B) to enable States to pace costs against State budgets, plan effectively, and address unexpected changes in costs in a timely manner, on the following dates: (A) April 30, for the period encompassing January through March of such year. (B) July 31, for the period encompassing April through June of such year. (C) October 31, for the period encompassing July through September of such year. (c) INVOICES.—Not later than February 15, 2015, and monthly thereafter, Amtrak shall provide to each State that sponsors a Statesupported route a monthly invoice of the cost of operating such route, including fixed costs and third-party costs. (d) DISPUTE RESOLUTION.— (1) REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RESOLUTION.—If a dispute arises with respect to a forecast developed under subsection (b), an invoice developed under subsection (c), or the terms of a contract for operation of a State-supported route negotiated between Amtrak and a State that sponsors the route, either Amtrak or the State may request that the Surface Transportation Board conduct expedited dispute resolution under this subsection. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 38 (2) PROCEDURES.—The Surface Transportation Board shall establish procedures for expedited resolution of disputes brought before it under this subsection. (3) BINDING EFFECT.—The decision of the Surface Transportation Board under this subsection shall be binding on the parties to the dispute. (e) FRA ASSISTANCE.—The Federal Railroad Administration may provide assistance to the parties in the course of negotiations for a contract for operation of a State-supported route. (f) PERFORMANCE METRICS.—In negotiating a contract for operation of a State-supported route, Amtrak and the State or States that sponsor the route shall consider including provisions that provide penalties and incentives for performance based on metrics that take into account only those factors within the control of Amtrak or the State or States. (g) DEFINITION OF STATE.—In this section, the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. * * * * * * * CHAPTER 249—NORTHEAST CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Sec. 24901. Definitions. * * * * * * * 24906. Northeast Corridor planning. * * * * * * * § 24906. Northeast Corridor planning (a) NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN.— (1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, and annually thereafter, the Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission established under section 24905 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall develop a capital investment plan for the Northeast Corridor main line between Boston, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and the Northeast Corridor branch lines connecting to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Springfield, Massachusetts, and Spuyten Duyvil, New York, and facilities and services used to operate and maintain those lines. (2) CONTENTS.—Each such plan shall— (A) be developed to establish a coordinated approach to capital spending on the Northeast Corridor; (B) cover a period of 5 fiscal years, beginning with the first fiscal year after the date of the plan; (C) notwithstanding section 24902(b), prioritize projects and investments along the Northeast Corridor based on— (i) the anticipated benefits and costs of projects; (ii) the anticipated Federal and non-Federal funding available; and (iii) the information contained in the Northeast Corridor asset management plans required under subsection (b), once available; emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 39 (D) ensure coordination and optimization across the entire Northeast Corridor and among the various owners and users; (E) include a financial plan for the investment period that— (i) categorizes each capital project as being primarily associated with— (I) normalized capital replacement; (II) replacement, rehabilitation, or repair of Northeast Corridor infrastructure assets, including tunnels, bridges, stations, and other assets; or (III) improvement of train performance on the Northeast Corridor, including reduced trip times, increased train frequencies, higher operating speeds, and other improvements; (ii) identifies the anticipated funding source and financing method for each capital project described in subclauses (II) and (III) of clause (i); (iii) describes the anticipated outcomes of each project, including— (I) an assessment of the potential effect on passenger accessibility, operations, safety, reliability, and resiliency, and on the ability of infrastructure owners and operators to meet regulatory requirements should the project not be funded; and (II) an assessment of the benefits and costs; (iv) identifies the extent to which the capital assets are or will be jointly used by intercity passenger rail service and other users, and the proportionate share of that joint usage; and (v) for projects that are expected to be fully or partially funded through Federal financial assistance, identifies the most appropriate public agency or entity to receive those funds and implement each capital project. (3) ADDITIONAL CONTENTS.—Any plan developed under paragraph (1) after the publication by the Secretary of Transportation of the Northeast Corridor service development plan shall also— (A) be developed to identify, prioritize, and phase the implementation of projects necessary to achieve the goals and findings contained in such Northeast Corridor service development plan; (B) allow for flexibility to change prioritization and programs based upon the availability of Federal and non-Federal funding; (C) inform the Secretary in developing recommendations for Congress on Federal funding needs for the Northeast Corridor and any corresponding Federal investments in the respective capital programs for Northeast Corridor infrastructure owners and users; and (D) capture the network-level anticipated outcomes associated with plan implementation, including the anticipated effect on passenger accessibility, operations, safety, reliability, and resiliency. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 40 (b) NORTHEAST CORRIDOR ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANS.— (1) CONTENTS.—Amtrak, and States and public transportation entities that own infrastructure that supports or provides for intercity rail passenger transportation on the Northeast Corridor, shall develop and update as necessary Northeast Corridor asset management plans for the Northeast Corridor main line between Boston, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and the Northeast Corridor branch lines connecting to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Springfield, Massachusetts, and Spuyten Duyvil, New York, and facilities and services used to operate and maintain those lines, that— (A) are consistent with the Federal Transit Administration process, as authorized under section 5326, when implemented; (B) include, at a minimum— (i) an inventory of all capital assets owned by the developer of the plan; (ii) an assessment of the condition of each of those assets; (iii) a description of how the condition of each asset has changed since the previous iteration of the plan; and (iv) a description of the necessary resources and processes for bringing or maintaining those assets in a state-of-good repair, including decision support tools and investment prioritization methodologies. (2) TRANSMITTAL TO COMMISSION.—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, each entity described in paragraph (1) shall transmit to the Commission a plan developed under paragraph (1). Any updates to such plan shall also be transmitted to the Commission. (c) NORTHEAST CORRIDOR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATES.—The Commission shall, at least once every 10 years, update the Northeast Corridor service development plan. * * * * * * * PASSENGER RAIL INVESTMENT AND IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2008 * * * * * * * DIVISION B—AMTRAK * * * * * * * TITLE II—AMTRAK REFORM AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS * * * * * * * emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 41 øSEC. 204. DEVELOPMENT OF 5-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN. ø(a) DEVELOPMENT OF 5-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN.—The Amtrak Board of Directors shall submit an annual budget and business plan for Amtrak, and a 5-year financial plan for the fiscal year to which that budget and business plan relate and the subsequent 4 years, prepared in accordance with this section, to the Secretary and the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation no later than— ø(1) the first day of each fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act; or ø(2) the date that is 60 days after the date of enactment of an appropriations Act for the fiscal year, if later. ø(b) CONTENTS OF 5-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN.—The 5-year financial plan for Amtrak shall include, at a minimum— ø(1) all projected revenues and expenditures for Amtrak, including governmental funding sources; ø(2) projected ridership levels for all Amtrak passenger operations; ø(3) revenue and expenditure forecasts for non-passenger operations; ø(4) capital funding requirements and expenditures necessary to maintain passenger service in order to accommodate predicted ridership levels and predicted sources of capital funding; ø(5) operational funding needs, if any, to maintain current and projected levels of passenger service, including State-supported routes and predicted funding sources; ø(6) projected capital and operating requirements, ridership, and revenue for any new passenger service operations or service expansions; ø(7) an assessment of the continuing financial stability of Amtrak, as indicated by factors such as anticipated Federal funding of capital and operating costs, Amtrak’s ability to efficiently recruit, retain, and manage its workforce, and Amtrak’s ability to effectively provide passenger rail service; ø(8) estimates of long-term and short-term debt and associated principal and interest payments (both current and anticipated); ø(9) annual cash flow forecasts; ø(10) a statement describing methods of estimation and significant assumptions; ø(11) specific measures that demonstrate measurable improvement year over year in the financial results of Amtrak’s operations; ø(12) prior fiscal year and projected operating ratio, cash operating loss, and cash operating loss per passenger on a route, business line, and corporate basis; ø(13) prior fiscal year and projected specific costs and savings estimates resulting from reform initiatives; ø(14) prior fiscal year and projected labor productivity statistics on a route, business line, and corporate basis; ø(15) prior fiscal year and projected equipment reliability statistics; and ø(16) capital and operating expenditures for anticipated security needs. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 42 ø(c) STANDARDS TO PROMOTE FINANCIAL STABILITY.—In meeting the requirements of subsection (b), Amtrak shall— ø(1) apply sound budgetary practices, including reducing costs and other expenditures, improving productivity, increasing revenues, or combinations of such practices; ø(2) use the categories specified in the financial accounting and reporting system developed under section 203 when preparing its 5-year financial plan; and ø(3) ensure that the plan is consistent with the authorizations of appropriations under title I of this division. ø(d) REVIEW BY DOT INSPECTOR GENERAL.—Within 60 days after their submission by Amtrak, the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation shall review the annual budget and the 5- year financial plans prepared by Amtrak under this section to determine whether they meet the requirements of subsection (b) and shall furnish any relevant findings to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.¿ SEC. 205. RESTRUCTURING LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASES. (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary and Amtrak, may make agreements to restructure Amtrak’s indebtedness øas of the date of enactment of this Act. This authorization expires 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.¿, to the extent provided in advance in appropriations Acts. (b) DEBT RESTRUCTURING.—øThe Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation¿ To the extent amounts are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary and Amtrak, shall enter into negotiations with the holders of Amtrak debt, including leases, outstanding øas of the date of enactment of this Act¿ for the purpose of restructuring (including repayment) and repaying that debt. The Secretary of the Treasury may secure agreements for restructuring or repayment on such terms as the Secretary of the Treasury deems favorable to the interests of the United States Government. * * * * * * * (d) PAYMENT OF RENEGOTIATED DEBT.—If the criteria under subsection (c) are met, the Secretary of the Treasury may assume or repay the restructured debt, as appropriate, to the extent provided in advance in appropriations Acts. (e) AMTRAK PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST PAYMENTS.— (1) PRINCIPAL ON DEBT SERVICE.—Unless the Secretary of the Treasury makes sufficient payments to creditors under subsection (d) so that Amtrak is required to make no payments to creditors in a fiscal year, the Secretary shall use funds authorized øby section 102 of this division¿ for the use of Amtrak for retirement of principal or payment of interest on loans for capital equipment, or capital leases. (2) REDUCTIONS IN AUTHORIZATION LEVELS.—Whenever action taken by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (a) results in reductions in amounts of principal or interest that Amtrak must service on existing debt, the corresponding emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 43 amounts authorized øby section 102¿ for Amtrak shall be reduced accordingly. (f) LEGAL EFFECT OF PAYMENTS UNDER THIS SECTION.—The payment of principal and interest on secured debt, other than debt assumed under subsection (d), with the proceeds of grants under subsection (e) shall not— (1) modify the extent or nature of any indebtedness of Amtrak to the United States in existence øas of the date of enactment of this Act¿; * * * * * * * øSEC. 206. ESTABLISHMENT OF GRANT PROCESS. ø(a) GRANT REQUESTS.—Amtrak shall submit grant requests (including a schedule for the disbursement of funds), consistent with the requirements of this division, to the Secretary for funds authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak under sections 101(a), (b), and (c), 102, 219(b), and 302. ø(b) PROCEDURES FOR GRANT REQUESTS.—The Secretary shall establish substantive and procedural requirements, including schedules, for grant requests under this section not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act and shall transmit copies of such requirements and schedules to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. As part of those requirements, the Secretary shall require, at a minimum, that Amtrak deposit grant funds, consistent with the appropriated amounts for each area of expenditure in a given fiscal year, in the following 2 accounts: ø(1) The Amtrak Operating account. ø(2) The Amtrak General Capital account. Amtrak may not transfer such funds to another account or expend such funds for any purpose other than the purposes covered by the account in which the funds are deposited without approval by the Secretary. ø(c) REVIEW AND APPROVAL.— ø(1) 30-DAY APPROVAL PROCESS.—The Secretary shall complete the review of a grant request (including the disbursement schedule) and approve or disapprove the request within 30 days after the date on which Amtrak submits the grant request. If the Secretary disapproves the request or determines that the request is incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall include the reason for disapproval or the incomplete items or deficiencies in a notice to Amtrak. ø(2) 15-DAY MODIFICATION PERIOD.—Within 15 days after receiving notification from the Secretary under the preceding sentence, Amtrak shall submit a modified request for the Secretary’s review. ø(3) REVISED REQUESTS.—Within 15 days after receiving a modified request from Amtrak, the Secretary shall either approve the modified request, or, if the Secretary finds that the request is still incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall identify in writing to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate the emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 44 remaining deficiencies and recommend a process for resolving the outstanding portions of the request.¿ * * * * * * * øSEC. 208. METHODOLOGIES FOR AMTRAK ROUTE AND SERVICE PLANNING DECISIONS. ø(a) METHODOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.—Within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Railroad Administration shall obtain the services of a qualified independent entity to develop and recommend objective methodologies for Amtrak to use in determining what intercity passenger routes and services it will provide, including the establishment of new routes, the elimination of existing routes, and the contraction or expansion of services or frequencies over such routes. In developing such methodologies, the entity shall consider— ø(1) the current or expected performance and service quality of intercity passenger train operations, including cost recovery, on-time performance and minutes of delay, ridership, on-board services, stations, facilities, equipment, and other services; ø(2) connectivity of a route with other routes; ø(3) the transportation needs of communities and populations that are not well served by intercity passenger rail service or by other forms of intercity transportation; ø(4) Amtrak’s and other major intercity passenger rail service providers in other countries’ methodologies for determining intercity passenger rail routes and services; and ø(5) the views of the States and other interested parties. ø(b) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the entity shall submit recommendations developed under subsection (a) to Amtrak, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. ø(c) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS.—Within 90 days after receiving the recommendations developed under subsection (a) by the entity, the Amtrak Board of Directors shall consider the adoption of those recommendations. The Board shall transmit a report to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate explaining its reasons for adopting or not adopting the recommendations.¿ SEC. 208. METHODOLOGIES FOR AMTRAK ROUTE AND SERVICE PLANNING DECISIONS. (a) METHODOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, as a condition of receiving a grant under section 101 of such Act, Amtrak shall obtain the services of an independent entity to develop and recommend objective methodologies for Amtrak to use in determining what intercity rail passenger transportation routes and services it should provide, including the establishment of new routes, the elimination of existing routes, and the contraction or expansion of services or frequencies over such routes. (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—Amtrak shall require the entity, in developing the methodologies described in subsection (a), to consider— emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 45 (1) the current and expected performance and service quality of intercity rail passenger transportation operations, including cost recovery, on-time performance, ridership, on-board services, stations, facilities, equipment, and other services; (2) connectivity of a route with other routes; (3) the transportation needs of communities and populations that are not well served by intercity rail passenger transportation service or by other forms of intercity transportation; (4) the methodologies of Amtrak and major intercity rail passenger transportation service providers in other countries for determining intercity passenger rail routes and services; (5) the views of States, rail carriers that own infrastructure over which Amtrak operates, Amtrak employee representatives, and other interested parties; and (6) the funding levels that will be available under authorization levels that have been enacted into law. (c) RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, Amtrak shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate the recommendations developed by the entity pursuant to subsection (a). (d) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not later than 90 days after transmitting the recommendations pursuant to subsection (c), the Amtrak Board of Directors shall consider the adoption of the recommendations and transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing an explanation of any reasons for adopting or not adopting the recommendations. * * * * * * * øSEC. 211. NORTHEAST CORRIDOR STATE-OF-GOOD-REPAIR PLAN. ø(a) IN GENERAL.—Within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, Amtrak, in consultation with the Secretary and the States (including the District of Columbia) that make up the Northeast Corridor (as defined in section 24102 of title 49, United States Code), shall prepare a capital spending plan for capital projects required to return the railroad right-of-way (including track, signals, and auxiliary structures), facilities, stations, and equipment, of the Northeast Corridor main line to a state-of-goodrepair by the end of fiscal year 2018, consistent with the funding levels authorized in this division, and shall submit the plan to the Secretary. ø(b) REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE SECRETARY.— ø(1) 60-DAY APPROVAL PROCESS.—The Secretary shall complete the review of the capital spending plan and approve or disapprove the plan within 60 days after the date on which Amtrak submits the plan. During review, the Secretary may seek comments from the Commission established under section 24905 of title 49, United States Code, and other Northeast Corridor users regarding the plan. If the Secretary disapproves the plan or determines that the plan is incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall include the reason for disapproval or the incomplete items or deficiencies in a notice to Amtrak. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 46 ø(2) 15-DAY MODIFICATION PERIOD.—Within 15 days after receiving notification from the Secretary under paragraph (1), Amtrak shall submit a modified plan for the Secretary’s review. ø(3) REVISED REQUESTS.—Within 15 days after receiving a modified plan from Amtrak, the Secretary shall either approve the modified plan, or, if the Secretary finds that the plan is still incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall identify in writing to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate the remaining deficiencies and recommend a process for resolving the outstanding portions of the plan. ø(c) PLAN UPDATES.—The plan shall be updated at least annually and the Secretary shall review and approve such updates, in accordance with the procedures described in subsection (b). ø(d) GRANTS.—The Secretary shall make grants to Amtrak with funds authorized by section 101(c) for Northeast Corridor capital investments contained within the capital spending plan prepared by Amtrak and approved by the Secretary. ø(e) OVERSIGHT.—Using the funds authorized by section 101(d), the Secretary shall review Amtrak’s capital expenditures funded by this section to ensure that such expenditures are consistent with the capital spending plan and that Amtrak is providing adequate project management oversight and fiscal controls. ø(f) ELIGIBILITY OF EXPENDITURES.—The Federal share of expenditures for capital improvements under this section may not exceed 100 percent.¿ * * * * * * * SEC. 217. ACCESS TO AMTRAK EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES. If a State desires to select or selects an entity other than Amtrak to provide services required for the operation of an intercity passenger train route described in section ø24102(5)(D)¿ 24102(7)(D) or 24702 of title 49, United States Code, the State may make an agreement with Amtrak to use facilities and equipment of, or have services provided by, Amtrak under terms agreed to by the State and Amtrak to enable the State to utilize an entity other than Amtrak to provide services required for operation of the route. If the parties cannot agree upon terms, and the Surface Transportation Board finds that access to Amtrak’s facilities or equipment, or the provision of services by Amtrak, is necessary to carry out this provision and that the operation of Amtrak’s other services will not be impaired thereby, the Surface Transportation Board shall, within 120 days after submission of the dispute, issue an order that the facilities and equipment be made available, and that services be provided, by Amtrak, and shall determine reasonable compensation, liability, and other terms for use of the facilities and equipment and provision of the services. Compensation shall be determined, as appropriate, in accordance with the methodology established pursuant to section 209 of this division, if available. * * * * * * * emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 47 TITLE III—INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL POLICY * * * * * * * SEC. 305. NEXT GENERATION CORRIDOR TRAIN EQUIPMENT POOL. (a) IN GENERAL.—Within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, Amtrak shall establish a Next Generation Corridor Equipment Pool Committee, comprised of representatives of Amtrak, the Federal Railroad Administration, host freight railroad companies, passenger railroad equipment manufacturers, nonprofit organizations representing employees who perform overhaul and maintenance of passenger railroad equipment, interested States, and, as appropriate, other passenger railroad operators. The purpose of the Committee shall be to design, develop specifications for, and procure standardized next-generation corridor equipment. * * * * * * * (c) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—Amtrak and States participating in the Committee may enter into agreements for the funding, procurement, remanufacture, ownership, and management of corridor equipment, including equipment currently owned or leased by Amtrak and next-generation corridor equipment acquired as a result of the Committee’s actionsø, and may establish a corporation, which may be owned or jointly-owned by Amtrak, participating States, or other entities, to perform these functions¿. * * * * * * * (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2010, to remain available until expended, for grants to Amtrak and States participating in the Next Generation Corridor Train Equipment Pool Committee established under this section for the purpose of designing, developing specifications for, and initiating the procurement of an initial order of 1 or more types of standardized nextgeneration corridor train equipment øand establishing a jointlyowned corporation to manage that equipment¿. * * * * * * * RAILROAD REVITALIZATION AND REGULATORY REFORM ACT OF 1976 * * * * * * * TITLE V—RAILROAD REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT FINANCING * * * * * * * SEC. 502. DIRECT LOANS AND LOAN GUARANTEES. (a) * * * * * * * * * * (c) PRIORITY PROJECTS.—In granting applications for direct loans or guaranteed loans under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to projects that— emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 48 (1) enhance public safety, including projects for the installation of a positive train control (as defined in section 20157(i) of title 49, United States Code) system; * * * * * * * (d) EXTENT OF AUTHORITY.—The aggregate unpaid principal amounts of obligations under direct loans and loan guarantees made under this section shall not exceed $35,000,000,000 at any one time. Of this amount, 40 percent shall be available solely for projects described in subsection (l)(1), and not less than $7,000,000,000 shall be available solely for projects primarily benefiting freight railroads other than Class I carriers. The Secretary shall not establish any limit on the proportion of the unused amount authorized under this subsection that may be used for 1 loan or loan guarantee. * * * * * * * (h) CONDITIONS OF ASSISTANCE.—(1) * * * ø(2) The Secretary¿ (2) The Secretary may subordinate rights of the Secretary under any provision of title 49 or title 23 of the United States Code, to the rights of the Secretary under this section and section 503. (A) The Secretary shall not require an applicant for a direct loan or loan guarantee under this section to provide collateral. Any collateral provided or thereafter enhanced shall be valued as a going concern after giving effect to the present value of improvements contemplated by the completion and operation of the project. The Secretary shall not require that an applicant for a direct loan or loan guarantee under this section have previously sought the financial assistance requested from another source. The Secretary may subordinate rights of the Secretary under any provision of title 49 or title 23 of the United States Code, to the rights of the Secretary under this section and section 503. (B) The Secretary shall, for purposes of making a finding under subsection (g)(4), accept the net present value on a future stream of State or local subsidy income or dedicated revenue as collateral offered to secure the loan. (3) The Secretary shall require recipients of direct loans or loan guarantees under this section to comply with— (A) the standards of section 24312 of title 49, United States Code, as in effect on September 1, 2002, with respect to the project in the same manner that the National Railroad Passenger Corporation is required to comply with such standards for construction work financed under an agreement made under section 24308(a) of that title; øand¿ (B) the protective arrangements established under section 504 of this Act, with respect to employees affected by actions taken in connection with the project to be financed by the loan or loan guaranteeø.¿; and (C) the requirements of section 24405(a) of title 49, United States Code. (i) TIME LIMIT FOR APPROVAL OR øDISAPPROVAL.—¿ øNot later than 90 days after receiving¿ DISAPPROVAL.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after an application is determined pursuant to paragraph (2) to be a complete application for a direct loan or loan guarantee under this section, the Secretary shall approve or disapprove the application. In emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 49 order to enable compliance with such time limit, the Office of Management and Budget shall take any actions required with respect to the application within such 90-day period. (2) COMPLETION OF APPLICATION.—The Secretary shall establish procedures for making a determination, not later than 45 days after submission of an application under this section, whether the application is complete. Such procedures shall— (A) provide for a checklist of the required components of a complete application; (B) require the Secretary to provide to the applicant a description of the specific components of the application that remain incomplete if an application is determined to be incomplete; and (C) permit reapplication without prejudice for applications determined to be incomplete. (3) INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ANALYST.—The Secretary shall assign an independent financial analyst within 45 days of submittal of a complete application. * * * * * * * (k) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the program under this section that provides information on loans approved and disapproved by the Secretary during the previous year. Such report shall not disclose the identity of direct loan or loan guarantee recipients. The report shall describe— (1) the number of pre-application meetings with potential applicants; (2) the number of applications received and determined complete under subsection (i)(2), including the requested loan amounts; (3) the dates of receipt of applications; (4) the dates applications were determined complete under subsection (i)(2); (5) the number of applications determined incomplete under subsection (i)(2); (6) the final decision dates for both approvals and disapprovals of applications; (7) the number of applications withdrawn from consideration; and (8) the annual loan portfolio asset quality. (l) NORTHEAST CORRIDOR FAST FORWARD.— (1) PURPOSE.—The Secretary, as part of the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing program, shall provide direct loans and loan guarantees to eligible entities described in subsection (a) for capital projects to improve the Northeast Corridor (as used in section 24906 of title 49, United States Code). (2) COLLATERAL.—Loans made or guaranteed under this subsection shall require collateral equal to the loan amount requested. (3) INVESTMENT GRADE RATING.—A direct loan or loan guarantee shall be made under this subsection only if a rating agency has assigned an investment grade rating of BBB minus, Baa3, bbb minus, BBB (low), (or equivalent) or higher to the project obligation. For purposes of this paragraph, the term emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING 50 ‘‘rating agency’’ means a credit rating agency registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (as that term is defined in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a))). (4) INCLUSION IN NEC PLANNING.—Loans and loan guarantees made under this subsection shall be for projects that are included in the most recent 5-year budget and business plan prepared pursuant to section 24906(a) of title 49, United States Code. (5) REFINANCING.—Loans made or guaranteed under this subsection shall not be used for the refinancing of outstanding debt incurred. (6) COHORT OF LOANS.—Subsection (f)(4) shall not apply to loans made or guaranteed under this subsection. * * * * * * * Æ emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
text/markdown
49–006 113 TH C ONGRESS R EPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 113–629 PASSENGER RAIL REFORM AND INVESTMENT ACT OF 2014 D ECEMBER 1, 2014.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. S HUSTER , from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, submitted the following ### R E P O R T [To accompany H.R. 5449] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 5449) to reauthorize Federal support for passenger rail programs, and for other purposes, having consideredthe same, report favorably thereon with amendments and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. CONTENTS Page Purpose of Legislation ............................................................................................. 2 Background and Need for Legislation .................................................................... 2 Hearings ................................................................................................................... 4 Legislative History and Consideration .................................................................. 4 Committee Votes ...................................................................................................... 4 Committee Oversight Findings ............................................................................... 4 New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures ...................................................... 5 Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate .......................................................... 5 Performance Goals and Objectives ......................................................................... 9 Advisory of Earmarks .............................................................................................. 9 Duplication of Federal Programs ............................................................................ 9 Disclosure of Directed Rule Makings ..................................................................... 9 Federal Mandate Statement ................................................................................... 9 Preemption Clarification ......................................................................................... 9 Advisory Committee Statement .............................................................................. 10 Applicability of Legislative Branch ........................................................................ 10 Section-by-Section Analysis of Legislation ............................................................ 10 Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported ..................................... 19 The amendments (stated in terms of the page and line numbers of the introduced bill) are as follows: Page 45, after line 14, insert the following: (4) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation’’ and inserting ‘‘To theextent amounts are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation’’; (5) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘, to the extent provided in advance in appropriations Acts’’ after ‘‘as appropriate’’; Page 45, line 15, strike ‘‘(4)’’ and insert ‘‘(6)’’. Page 45, line 17, strike ‘‘(5)’’ and insert ‘‘(7)’’. P URPOSE OF L EGISLATION H.R. 5449 authorizes the nation’s passenger rail programs, including the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak),and Amtrak’s Office of the Inspector General, and the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) loan and grant programs for rail investments. H.R. 5449 fundamentally changes the authorization structure of Amtrak by providing funding by service, or ‘‘lines ofbusiness’’, rather than applying the previous structure which provided separate grants for operating and capital/debt service activities. It also reforms Amtrak’s operations, budgeting, and planningprocesses, and allows for more private sector participation in stations, rights-of-way, and operations. H.R. 5449 makes furtherchanges to intercity passenger rail policy administered by FRA, including revisions to grant programs, loan programs, and the delivery process for projects, to ensure better oversight and accelerate infrastructure projects. B ACKGROUND AND N EED FOR L EGISLATION For nearly 100 years, America was the unquestioned global leader in passenger rail. During that time, trains were the primary, and in many cases, the only, mode of transportation available formedium- and long-distance travel. However, the advent of commercial aviation and the Interstate Highway System provided new transportation alternatives and changed the equation. In the face of this stiff competition, our Nation’s passenger rail system faded into disuse and disrepair. Today, however, passenger rail presents one of the best hopes for relieving the country’s congested highways and airspace. In 2006, the United States population reached 300 million people, and by 2039 the country is expected to break the 400 million mark. The population concentration in the nation’s urban areas is increasing, in particular on the eastern seaboard and the Northeast Corridor(NEC) between Washington, DC, New York City, and Boston. Congestion costs also continue to rise. Crippling congestion and poor roads cost businesses and commuters almost $115 billion each year in wasted time and fuel—up from $24 billion in 1982. In addition,Americans spend more than 4 billion hours annually stuck in traffic. These statistics indicate that passenger rail must be part of thesolution to the nation’s transportation needs. H.R. 5449, the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 (PRRIA), reforms and improves the nation’s intercity passenger rail system to meet the challenges of the nation’s continued growth. Any reform of passenger rail must start with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), whose mission is to providerail passenger service to the country. Since it began providing service in 1971, Amtrak has relied upon federal funds to remain solvent. While more efficient operations and reforms could help reducereliance on federal funds, the full costs of operations and capital expenses will require federal funds for the foreseeable future. In addition to federal funding, Amtrak generates revenues from operations of its three functions, or lines of business: (1) NEC; (2) state-supported routes; and (3) long-distance routes. The NEC is a line of railroad track owned by Amtrak and others that runs from Washington, D.C., to Boston, Massachusetts. Amtrak operates both its higher speed Acela trains and lower speed regional trains on the NEC, while also managing the infrastructure. The majority oftrains on the NEC, however, are not Amtrak’s, but commuter railroads’ serving major cities and their suburbs in the Northeast. Indeed, of the 2,000 daily trains on the NEC, only approximately 200 are Amtrak’s. These statistics underlie the importance of the NEC, but also show a strong need for infrastructure improvements and involvement of the states. PRRIA makes several significant steps to increase infrastructure investment in the NEC and improve planning and coordination among all users of the NEC to ensure the asset is properly utilized and improved for better service. Amtrak also operates 21 state-supported routes in 19 states, where states contribute funding to provide additional passenger rail services. These are corridors of less than 750 miles, primarily located in the Northeast, Midwest, and Pacific Coast, and connect major metropolitan areas. State-supported corridor services carry nearly half of Amtrak’s annual riders—about 15.1 million riders. While states are required by a previous authorization of Amtrak to contribute funding for these corridors, PRRIA ensures that statesare accurately billed for the services Amtrak provides. It also establishes a dispute resolution mechanism to help resolve disagreements on costs for the service. Finally, Amtrak operates 15 long distance routes that utilize a network of over 18,500 miles of privately-owned freight rail trackand carry more than 4.8 million passengers. These routes are primarily legacy routes taken over by Amtrak from the freight railroads when Amtrak was formed in 1971, and are the only Amtrak trains in 23 of the 46 states in the network. PRRIA ensures these routes are evaluated to enhance efficiency and reduce losses. PRRIA not only makes the above noted changes to the way eachline-of-business is run, it also advances the lines-of-business approach by authorizing Amtrak funding for operations and capitalinto two accounts, the NEC account and the National Network account, which includes state-supported and long-distance routes. In addition, Amtrak’s planning and grant requests must be divided by line-of-business; therefore, on the whole, PRRIA advances Amtrak’s reorganization of the company into business lines, and prohibitscross-subsidization among accounts, except for specific transfer authority available after notification to the Amtrak Board of Directors. These reforms will enhance accountability and transparency, while improving the performance of each business line. Beyond Amtrak reforms, PRRIA also focuses on the developmentof the nation’s rail system generally. The bill leverages infrastructure resources, creates more opportunities for non-Federal participation in passenger rail, streamlines FRA processes for project development, improves procedures for FRA’s rail loan program, and enhances oversight of FRA-administered grant programs. Overall,PRRIA makes reforms to passenger rail infrastructure and programs that will help advance passenger rail as a solution for the nation’s transportation needs. H EARINGS On April 11, 2013, the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines,and Hazardous Materials (Subcommittee) held a hearing on Amtrak’s grant request for fiscal year 2014, and how it relates to Amtrak’s on-going reorganization and the reauthorization of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008. On May 21,2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing to discuss Amtrak’s financial performance by service type and overall trends in costs, its spending of federal funds, and how it runs as a business. On June 6–7, 2013, the Subcommittee hosted a roundtable on an Amtraktrain to New York, NY and a field hearing in New York, NY, respectively, to assess and discuss the importance of the Northeast Corridor (NEC) to the states it serves, the regional economy, and transportation network. On June 27, 2013, the Subcommittee hosted a listening session and heard from major stakeholders on developing the nation’s rail policy for the next reauthorization. OnJuly 9, 2013, the Subcommittee held a hearing on the role of innovative financing tools to advance intercity passenger rail projects. L EGISLATIVE H ISTORY AND C ONSIDERATION On September 11, 2014, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Bill Shuster and Ranking Member Nick Rahall and Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials Chairman Jeff Denham and Ranking Member CorrineBrown introduced H.R. 5449, the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act (PRRIA). On September 17, 2014, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure met in open session and ordered the bill reported favorably to the House by voice vote with a quorum present. No amendments were offered. C OMMITTEE V OTES Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires each committee report to include the total number of votes cast for and against on each record vote on a motion to report and on any amendment offered to the measure or matter, and the names of those members voting for and against. There were no record votes taken in connection with consideration of H.R. 5449. C OMMITTEE O VERSIGHT F INDINGS With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII ofthe Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee’s oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in this report. N EW B UDGET AUTHORITY AND T AX E XPENDITURES Clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives does not apply where a cost estimate and comparison prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 has been timelysubmitted prior to the filing of the report and is included in the report. Such a cost estimate is included in this report. C ONGRESSIONAL B UDGET O FFICE C OST E STIMATE With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has received the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 5449 from the Director of the Congressional Budget Office: U.S. C ONGRESS , C ONGRESSIONAL B UDGET O FFICE , Washington, DC, November 24, 2014. Hon. B ILL S HUSTER , Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. D EAR M R . C HAIRMAN : The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 5449, the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014. If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Sarah Puro. Sincerely, D OUGLAS W. E LMENDORF . Enclosure. H.R. 5449—Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 Summary: CBO estimates that H.R. 5449 would authorize theappropriation of $5.8 billion over the 2015–2019 period for rail programs administered by Amtrak, states, and the Department of Transportation (DOT). That amount includes $4.0 billion for grants to Amtrak, $1.2 billion for grants to states for intercity rail projects, and $500 million to renegotiate and prepay a portion of Amtrak’s nonfederal debt. Assuming appropriation of the amountsspecified and estimated to be necessary, CBO estimates that implementing the legislation would cost $5.5 billion over the 2015–2019 period. Pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply to this legislation because it would not affect direct spending or revenues. H.R. 5449 would impose intergovernmental and private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act(UMRA) by requiring some state and local governments and Amtrak to create plans and submit reports about the capital assets ofintercity passenger rail systems. The bill also would place new administrative and operational requirements on Amtrak. CBO estimates that the cost to both public and private entities of complying with those mandates would be small and would fall below the annual thresholds established in UMRA for intergovernmental andprivate-sector mandates ($76 million and $152 million in 2014, respectively, adjusted annually for inflation). Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary effect of H.R. 5449 is shown in the following table. The cost of this legislation falls within budget function 400 (transportation). By fiscal year, in millions of dollars— 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015– 2019 CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION Capital and Operating Grants to Amtrak: Estimated Authorization Level ................................. 0 1,313 1,340 1,370 0 4,023 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 0 1,086 1,263 1,363 273 3,985 Cost to Renegotiate and Prepay Amtrak’s Nonfederal Debt: Estimated Authorization Level ................................. 0 125 125 125 125 500 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 0 125 125 125 125 500 Grants to States for Rail Projects: Authorization Level .................................................. 300 300 300 300 0 1,200 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 30 150 225 270 270 945 Amtrak Inspector General: Authorization Level .................................................. 0 24 24 25 0 73 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 0 22 24 25 2 73 Other Provisions: Estimated Authorization Level ................................. 0 2 2 1 0 5 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 0 1 2 1 1 5 Total Changes: Estimated Authorization Level ................................. 300 1,764 1,791 1,821 125 5,801 Estimated Outlays ................................................... 30 1,384 1,639 1,784 671 5,508 Basis of estimate: For this estimate, CBO assumes that the bill will be enacted by the end of calendar year 2014 and that theamounts authorized and estimated to be necessary will be appropriated each year. Spending is based on historical patterns of spending on rail programs. CAPITAL AND OPERATING GRANTS TO AMTRAK H.R. 5449 would restructure the federal government’s funding support for Amtrak and would authorize the appropriation of about $4.0 billion for grants to Amtrak over the 2015–2018 period, CBOestimates. That amount includes specified amounts for the rail network between Boston, Massachusetts, and Washington, DC, and for the rail network in other parts of the country. Amtrak received a grant of $1.4 billion for fiscal year 2014 and (on an annualized basis as part of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015) for fiscal year 2015, for activities similar to those authorized in H.R. 5449. Assuming appropriation of the authorized amounts, CBO estimates enacting those provisions would cost $4.0 billionover the 2015–2019 period. As directed by the legislation, the specified authorization levels in H.R. 5449 for this activity have been reduced by $375 million to account for the cost to renegotiate and prepay a portion of Amtrak’s debt over the 2016–2018 period. RENEGOTIATION AND PREPAYMENT OF AMTRAK’ S NONFEDERAL DEBT Subject to the availability of appropriated funds, section 209would require the Secretary of the Treasury to negotiate with Amtrak’s creditors to prepay Amtrak’s debt with the goal of reducing Amtrak’s debt-service costs. Under the assumption that the federal government will continue to provide Amtrak with grants to pay a portion of its debt-service costs—as it has since 2006—those prepayments would also reduce future costs to the federal government. Based on information from Amtrak, it has about $1 billion innonfederal debt. However, based on information from the Department of the Treasury, not all of that debt could be favorably renegotiated to result in savings to both Amtrak and the federal government. Much of Amtrak’s nonfederal debt is for lease paymentsit makes for railcars and locomotives. In some of those leases, Amtrak has the option, at times specified in the lease contracts, to buy out the remainder of the lease term and take ownership of the rail equipment. In such cases, the Treasury would calculate the net present value of the stream of future lease payments compared to the cost to buy out the lease term to determine if savings would accrue to both the federal government and to Amtrak. Other debt includes a mortgage on New York’s Penn Station and tax-exemptbonds that are not callable until fiscal year 2022. Based on information about the components of Amtrak’s debt, CBO estimates that implementing this provision would cost $500 million over the 2015–2019 period. Under provisions of the bill, any amounts appropriated to Amtrak to renegotiate and prepay its debt would reduce the amounts authorized to be appropriated by the bill for Amtrak’s Capital and Debt Service Grants. CBO estimates that $500 million would be authorized to be appropriated to prepay Amtrak’s debt over the 2015–2019 period. The amounts authorized to be appropriated for Amtrak’s Capital and Debt Service Grants have been reduced by only $375 million, however, because those grants are authorized for three years under H.R. 5449. Over the next five years, CBO estimates that Amtrak’s debt-serv- ice costs would be reduced by about $20 million a year. However,over the next couple of decades Amtrak’s debt service would be reduced by more than $500 million. If the federal government continues to support Amtrak’s Capital and Debt Service Grants, those lower costs could be used to reduce the amount of grants to Amtrak in the future or could be used for other Amtrak priorities, including capital spending. GRANTS TO STATES FOR RAIL PROJECTS Over the 2015–2018 period, the bill would authorize the appro-priation of about $1.2 billion in grants to states for capital costs related to facilities, infrastructure, and equipment necessary for intercity passenger rail service. No amounts were appropriated for such grants in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015. CBO estimates that spending for those grants would total $945 million over the 2015–2019 period. AMTRAK INSPECTOR GENERAL H.R. 5449 would authorize the appropriation of $96 million for the operations of the Amtrak Inspector General over the 2015–2018period. However, that office received an appropriation of $23 million (on an annualized basis) in the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015, the same amount authorized for 2015 by H.R. 5449. Therefore, CBO estimates that implementing those provisions would have no effect in 2015 and would cost $73 million over the 2016–2019 period. OTHER PROVISIONS H.R. 5449 would require the Federal Rail Administration (FRA) to establish a working group to assess the feasibility of restoring rail service between New Orleans, Louisiana, and Orlando, Florida. The bill also would require the FRA to complete a rulemaking to revise how federal reviews of planned freight and commuter rail projects are conducted in order to adjust how the agency complies with the Historic Preservation Act. Based on information from FRA, CBO estimates that implementing those provisions would cost $5 million over the 2015–2019 period. Pay-As-You-Go considerations: None. Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: H.R. 5449 would impose intergovernmental and private-sector mandates as definedin UMRA by placing new requirements on public entities and Amtrak. CBO estimates that the cost for those entities to comply with the mandates would be small and would fall below the annualthresholds established in UMRA for intergovernmental and private-sector mandates ($76 million and $152 million in 2014, respectively, adjusted annually for inflation). MANDATES THAT APPLY TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTITIES H.R. 5449 would impose an intergovernmental and private-sectormandate by requiring some state and local governments and Amtrak to create plans and submit reports about the capital assets of intercity passenger rail systems. CBO estimates the cost to bothpublic and private entities of complying with the reporting requirement would be small. MANDATES THAT APPLY TO PRIVATE ENTITIES ONLY The bill would impose several additional mandates on Amtrak. It would require the Amtrak Board of Directors to consider options to improve boarding procedures and to evaluate requests to use an Amtrak right-of-way for other business activities. The bill also would require Amtrak to establish certain financial controls andsubmit to the Congress various reports, including a report on options to enhance development around Amtrak stations. Finally, thebill would modify Amtrak’s role on certain rail advisory committees. CBO estimates that the aggregate cost of complying with those mandates would be small. OTHER EFFECTS Other provisions of the bill would benefit states by authorizing grants to improve intercity rail passenger service. CBO estimates states would receive about $945 million over the 2015–2019 period,and any costs would be incurred voluntarily as a condition of federal assistance. Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: Sarah Puro; Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Melissa Merrell; Impact on the Private Sector: Amy Petz. Estimate approved by: Theresa Gullo, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. P ERFORMANCE G OALS AND O BJECTIVES With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the performance goals and objectives of this legislation are to authorize passenger railprograms administered by the Federal Railroad Administration, including the operating and capital funding for Amtrak and the intercity passenger rail grants, and reform Amtrak’s operations,budgeting, and planning. The bill also allows for more private sector participation in stations, rights-of-way, and passenger rail operations. Finally, H.R. 5449 makes further changes to intercity passenger rail policy, improving the administration of the rail grant programs, rail loan programs, and the delivery process for rail projects. A DVISORY OF E ARMARKS Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House ofRepresentatives, the Committee is required to include a list of congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in clause 9(e), 9(f), and 9(g) of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives. No provision in the bill includes an earmark, limited tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit under clause 9(e), 9(f), or 9(g) of rule XXI. D UPLICATION OF F EDERAL P ROGRAMS Pursuant to section 3(j) of H. Res. 5, 113th Cong. (2013), theCommittee finds that no provision of H.R. 5449 establishes or reauthorizes a program of the federal government known to be duplicative of another federal program, a program that was included in any report from the Government Accountability Office to Congress pursuant to section 21 of Public Law 111–139, or a program relatedto a program identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. D ISCLOSURE OF D IRECTED R ULE M AKINGS Pursuant to section 3(k) of H. Res. 5, 113th Cong. (2013), the Committee estimates that enacting H.R. 5449 specifically directsthe completion of a specific rule making within the meaning of section 551 of title 5, United States Code. Section 401 of H.R. 5449 requires the Secretary of Transportation to carry out a rulemaking regarding environmental streamlining of railroad projects. F EDERAL M ANDATE S TATEMENT The Committee adopts as its own the estimate of federal mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Public Law 104–4). P REEMPTION C LARIFICATION Section 423 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires the report of any Committee on a bill or joint resolution to include astatement on the extent to which the bill or joint resolution is intended to preempt state, local, or tribal law. The Committee states that H.R. 5449 does not preempt any state, local, or tribal law. H.R. 5449 preserves the rights and permitting authorities of states. A DVISORY C OMMITTEE S TATEMENT Section 203 of this legislation establishes an advisory committee, as defined by section 2 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5U.S.C. app.). Pursuant to section 5 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Committee determines that the functions of this advisory committee are not being carried out by existing agencies oradvisory commissions. The Committee also determines that the advisory committee has a clearly defined purpose, fairly balanced membership, and meets all of the other requirements of section 5(b) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. A PPLICABILITY OF L EGISLATIVE B RANCH The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to the terms and conditions of employment or access to public services oraccommodations within the meaning of section 102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act (Public Law 104–1). S ECTION - BY -S ECTION ANALYSIS OF L EGISLATION TITLE I — AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS Section 101. Authorization for Amtrak system Fiscal responsibility is a top priority for the Committee. For decades authorization bills have included unrealistic funding levels.PRRIA breaks this cycle by authorizing Amtrak at fiscally responsible, recently appropriated funding levels. This section authorizes funds to be appropriated for fiscal years 2015 through 2018 to the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (Secretary) for the use of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) for capital projects, operating grants, debt service payments, and other activities. However, instead of separate authorizations for capital and debtservice and for operating grants, subsection 101(a) authorizes funding to be appropriated to a new Northeast Corridor ImprovementFund account, for capital projects and debt service payments related to the corridor, and subsection 101(b) authorizes funding to be appropriated to a new National Network account for the capital and operating expenses of state-supported and long-distance routes, and for debt service payments related to those services. Subsection101(c) allows the Secretary to withhold up to one half of one percent of the funds authorized in this section for oversight purposes. The authorization structure contained in this section will ensure transparency in the federal funding requirements for Amtrak. Section 102. Authorization for Amtrak Office of Inspector General This section authorizes funds to be appropriated for fiscal years2015 through 2018 to the Secretary for the Office of Inspector General of Amtrak to conduct oversight of Amtrak’s operations and management. Section 103. National Infrastructure Investments This section authorizes funds to be appropriated for fiscal years 2015 through 2018 to the Secretary for capital grants for intercity passenger rail projects as authorized under Chapter 244 of Title 49, United States Code. Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated, 50 percent of funds shall be used for a Federal-State Partnership for Northeast Corridor Rehabilitation and Improvement program established under section 301 of this Act. Section 104. Northeast Corridor This section clarifies, for the purposes of this title, that the Northeast Corridor is defined as the main line between Boston,Massachusetts and Washington, District of Columbia, and the facilities and services necessary to operate and maintain that line. TITLE II — AMTRAK REFORM Section 201. Amtrak reform This section amends chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, by adding at the end the following new sections: Section 24317. Costs and revenues With the move to a lines-of-business approach for authorizing federal support for Amtrak, all costs and revenues of the company must be allocated to the newly created accounts. This new sectionrequires Amtrak to establish and maintain internal controls to ensure that all costs and revenues are allocated to either the NEC or National Network account. Section 24318. Grant process This new section lays out the procedures Amtrak shall follow when preparing and submitting to the Secretary and Congress a request for federal grants. It also sets forth the contents of such grant requests, including a detailed financial analysis by lines ofbusiness, a description of the work to be funded along with cost estimates and a timetable for completion of projects supported by thefederal funds, and other information similar in nature to budget requests of executive agencies of the federal government. The Committee believes the grant process and contents need to better justify federal support and give the taxpayers and Congress a more transparent understanding of the federal funds being invested, so that informed decisions can be made on the amount of federal funding provided each year. This new section also outlines the review and approval process for grant requests and the payment schedule for the Secretary to obligate and outlay funds to Amtrak. Section 24319. Accounts Due to the shift to a lines-of-business approach to authorizations, this new section requires Amtrak to establish two accounts, the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account and the NationalNetwork account. It mandates that all federal grant funds, compensation received from states pursuant to sections 209 and 212 of Division B of Public Law 110–432, and operating surpluses shall be allocated between the two accounts. The establishment of these two accounts eliminates the need to cross-subsidize Amtrak’s lines of business, though the section does include a transfer mechanism via notification to the Amtrak Board of Directors. Establishing theseaccounts ensures that profits generated on the NEC, and state access payments for use of the NEC, are reinvested on the corridor.Similarly, state payments, federal appropriations, and revenue generated on the National Network will go towards activities supported by that account. The Committee is concerned that Amtrak’s current structure is not transparent or aligned by core services. Establishing separateaccounts and only allowing funds to be transferred between the accounts following Amtrak notification and justification to the Amtrak Board of Directors will significantly increase transparency and accountability. Subsection (e) also requires the Secretary to issue letters of intent to obligate future year budget authority for major capital projects requiring multi-year funding to enhance certainty that the project will reach completion. Finally, the Committee is concerned about Amtrak’s history with procurements, including problems with the Acela fleet procurement and lack of funding to complete an ongoing purchase of sleepingand baggage cars. While the company has made progress on planning, it has been inconsistent with carrying out business cases for major procurements, even when it relies upon federal funding to make such purchases. PRRIA addresses this problem by mandating that Amtrak conduct a business case prior to entering into anylarge capital acquisition. Specifically, Amtrak must submit a business case to the Secretary and Congress for rolling stock purchases in excess of $100,000,000 that sets forth the costs and benefits of the procurement, the total payments by fiscal year, the source ofthe funding, whether the purchase will increase the need for federal funding, and contingency plans if there is no funding available for the purchase. This subsection is intended to improve Amtrak’s business planning while giving Congress and the public confidence that Amtrak is exercising effective stewardship of federal funds. Section 24906. Northeast corridor planning The NEC is a valuable transportation asset to the region and nation as a whole. It is also one of the world’s most complicated railroad corridors, with roughly 200 daily Amtrak trains and nearly1,800 daily commuter and freight trains. The last rail reauthorization created the Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission (NEC Commission) to act as the regionalbody to coordinate activities, and also required states to start contributing funds to keep maintaining the corridor. PRRIA significantly advances these efforts by empowering the NEC Commissionto act as a true planner and convener of the states, commuter railroads, and Amtrak. This enhanced governance regime will allow states to have an equal voice in the management of the corridor, and will ensure that all investments are coordinated appropriately among the infrastructure owners and users. Specifically, this section charges the NEC Commission to work in conjunction with Amtrak, the FRA, and the states to develop and implement a five-year NEC Capital Investment Plan in order to identify, prioritize, and phase projects needed to improve the NEC. This plan then becomes the basis upon which investments in the NEC must be made by Amtrak. Also, for projects to be eligible for both the Federal-State Partnership for NEC Development and Improvement grants established in section 301 and for the NEC Fast Forward RRIF loan set-aside established in section 303, the project must be included in the NEC Capital Investment Plan. This section also requires Amtrak, states, and public transportation entities that own infrastructure or operate service on the NEC to develop and submit to the NEC Commission NEC Asset Management Plans within 12 months of the enactment of the Act.Once developed, these asset plans will be used to inform the development of the NEC Capital Investment Plan. Furthermore, recognizing that the FRA is currently conducting a Service Development Plan for the NEC as part of its NEC FUTURE study, the NEC Commission is required to update that NEC Service Development Plan every 10 years. This will allow for an evaluation of service goals as ridership, revenues, and service levels evolve over the years. Section 202. Five-Year capital and operating plan PRRIA requires greater transparency into Amtrak’s accounting. Amtrak must provide detailed information to states on costs fortheir services. Furthermore, Amtrak is required to complete detailed five-year capital and financial plans, with annual explanations of how it met its prior year’s goals. This will help Congress,states, and the taxpayer better understand and evaluate its returnon-investment in Amtrak. This section requires the Amtrak Board of Directors to prepare five-year capital and operating plans for the NEC and the National Network within 60 days of an act appropriating funds to Amtrak.To ensure that the states are properly involved in Amtrak’s decision-making regarding their services, the plan must be done in consultation with the NEC Commission for NEC planning and thestates for National Network planning. Following the lines-of-business approach and to ensure that Congress is properly informed, this section identifies the specific information to be contained in the plans, including forecasts and projects, by each line of business.Also, this section requires Amtrak to plan based on real, constrained funding levels, not overly optimistic targets that will never materialize, by making the plans conform to authorized funding levels so that Congress is provided with realistic expectations of what can be achieved given the actual federal funds. Finally, this section requires that Amtrak update Congress on its progress monthly to maintain accountability throughout the year. Section 203. State-supported routes State-supported routes account for nearly half of Amtrak’s totalridership. While ridership has been successful, a patchwork of financial arrangements had developed between Amtrak and thestates with varying levels of support. Given this inconsistent approach, Section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA 2008) required Amtrak to work with the states to develop and implement a single, nationwide standardized methodology for establishing and allocating the costs of providing intercity rail service on state-supported routes. While most states have begun to pay for their state supported routes on an equal basis, states have raised concerns that Amtrak’s financial data is not transparent enough to know exactly what the underlying costs are for. At the same time, the Committee is concerned that some states are not paying Amtrak for services as required under section 209, and urges such states to take action to pay for such services. The section seeks to remedy these issues by requiring the Secretary to establish a State-Supported Route Advisory Committee made up of Amtrak, the Department of Transportation and theFRA, and seven states that sponsor state-supported routes, to promote cooperation and planning along the routes pursuant to section209 of PRIIA 2008. Amtrak will also be required to regularly submit detailed financial and performance information to the states. This will help to enhance transparency and accountability towardthe states paying for the service. Finally, this section creates an expedited dispute resolution process with the Surface Transportation Board functioning as the final arbiter. Section 204. Route and service planning Amtrak operates 15 long-distance trains over an 18,500 mile network serving 39 states, utilizing privately-owned freight rail track.PRIIA 2008 included several provisions to try to improve performance and reduce operating losses on these routes; however, no action on these provisions has been taken by the FRA. To ensure action is taken, this section requires Amtrak, not theFRA, to contract with a third party entity to develop and recommend objective methodologies for Amtrak to use in evaluatingwhat intercity passenger routes and services it will provide, including creation of new routes, elimination of existing routes, or other changes to improve service. Recommendations must be submittedto Congress, and the Amtrak Board of Directors is required to consider adoption of such recommendations and then explain to Congress its reasoning for adopting or not adopting those recommendations. Section 205. Competition Throughout the 113th Congress, with other modes becoming more congested, private providers of passenger rail have expressedinterest in developing new services. Indeed, several projects are underway for private companies to build and operate their own passenger rail lines in a couple of states. The Committee takes advantage of this rail renaissance and interest in passenger rail provision, by establishing an alternative passenger rail pilot program to encourage competition along certain Amtrak routes. Within ourfree market economic construct, competition can generate better efficiencies and improved services for the customer. Under the pilot program established here, rail carriers would submit bids to FRA, who would award the winning bidder the right and obligation to provide rail service over that route, as well as access to Amtrak’s reservation system, stations, and facilities as long as the companymaintains minimum FRA standards. In addition, the winning bidder may only receive 90 percent or less of the prior year’s Amtrak cost. This section grants FRA the authority to transfer a defined portion of Amtrak’s appropriation for that specific route to operate the alternative service. It also requires, no later than 1 year after the enactment of the Act, the FRA to issue a rulemaking to developthe pilot program. Finally, not later than 1 year after the concluVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING15 sion of the program, the FRA must submit the results of the pilot program to Congress. Section 206. Food and beverage reform For decades Amtrak has operated its food and beverage service at a loss. PRRIA addresses this problem by requiring that Amtrak implement a series of reforms to eliminate food and beverage losses in five years, which may include improved product and supply chain efficiencies; strengthened training and accountability for staff; improved scheduling of food and beverage staff; and ticket revenue enhancements. This section requires that within five years of enactment of the Act, the operating loss associated with providing food and beverage service on board trains will be eliminated. The section also includeslanguage protecting Amtrak’s existing workforce, but also mandates that after the five year period, no federal funding may be utilized to cover food and beverage losses. Section 207. Right-of-way leveraging Amtrak owns the majority of the NEC, which passes throughsome of the most densely populated areas of the country. The company also controls several other rail lines around the Nation. Theserailroad rights-of-way represent an untapped opportunity to partner with the private sector to generate additional non-passenger rail service revenue. Additional revenue would help reduce theneed of federal funding and allow more private investment for passenger rail. This section requires Amtrak to issue a Request for Proposals seeking private sector entities to utilize Amtrak-owned right-of-wayfor telecom systems, energy distribution systems, and other activities. The Amtrak Board of Directors is required to review each proposal, and no later than 18 months after the enactment of this Act must submit to Congress a summary of each proposal received as well as any proposals accepted. Section 208. Station development Rail stations are often located in desirable downtown locations and can become focal points for significant residential, commercial, and retail development, and enhance transportation options in communities. For example, Denver undertook a half a billion dollarproject to develop a commuter and intercity rail terminal, a regional bus facility, new light rail platforms, and improved public spaces, surrounded by significant private real estate development. Amtrak owns many of these stations, but leveraging their potential for real estate and other development and enhancement has beena low priority. The Committee urges Amtrak, among other proposals, to form partnerships that provide bike sharing programs and dedicated bike parking areas with lighting and accessibility in its stations to help enhance seamless transportation connections and grow ridership. This section requires Amtrak to transmit to Congress a report on options to enhance development around Amtrak stations not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act. Development proposalsshould strengthen multimodal connections, capture developmentrelated revenue streams, and pursue opportunities to better leverVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING16 age station assets. Doing so will generate more revenue to that lineof business within Amtrak which can be used to improve infrastructure. Section 209. Amtrak debt This section reauthorizes section 205 of PRIIA 2008 to restructure Amtrak’s debt. Ten years ago, Amtrak’s debt reached $3.7 billion. PRIIA 2008 provided authority for restructuring Amtrak’s debt which reduced its debt to $1.4 billion in just six short years. The Committee made technical changes to the bill that was ordered reported to address concerns raised by the Congressional BudgetOffice. These revisions were made pursuant to the unanimous consent agreement offered by the Chairman and agreed to by the Committee at the markup to permit the Chairman, after consultation with the Ranking Member, to strike or revise any provisions of any of the bills ordered reported that would cause the bill to be subject to a Budget Act or Rule 21 Cut-Go point of order. Section 210. Amtrak pilot program for passengers transporting domesticated cats and dogs This section requires Amtrak to develop and implement a pilotprogram to allow domesticated cats and dogs to travel on a specifically designated railcar. The animal must be in a kennel sized in accordance to Amtrak’s requirements for carry-on baggage. The passenger will pay a fee that, in the aggregate, covers the full costs of the pilot program. Section 211. Amtrak boarding procedures One of the benefits of intercity passenger rail is the ability to quickly board a train, from train stations centrally located in cities,as opposed to the airports, which are often located far from downtowns, and which require passengers to arrive much earlier before a departure time. However, Amtrak is not fully leveraging this competitive advantage and has seemingly cumbersome boarding procedures at some of its largest stations. This section requires the Amtrak Inspector General to conduct astudy comparing Amtrak boarding procedures at its 10 busiest stations to other rail boarding procedures, and make recommendations to the Amtrak Board of Directors to improve such procedures. Within six months of receiving the recommendations, the Board shall consider each recommendation for implementation. TITLE III — INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL POLICY Section 301. Federal-state partnership for NEC development and improvement The NEC is an incredibly valuable asset to both the region and the Nation, and it should be treated as such. Capital improvements are necessary to bring the corridor into a state of good repair andincrease service reliability. The NEC also acts as a valuable resource for states along the corridor. Of the nearly 2,000 trains that traverse the corridor daily, roughly 1,800 of them are commuter trains, not owned by Amtrak. This joint use highlights the need for greater reliability and efficiency, and presents opportunities for partnerships with states to improve this asset for all users. This section establishes a program under Chapter 244 of Title 49, United States Code, for issuing grants on a competitive basisfor the purpose of financing capital projects included in the Northeast Corridor Priority Project List. The list is required to include projects to improve the state of good repair of existing assets, and projects to improve intercity passenger rail performance through increased reliability, reduced trip times, and other improvements. Finally, states are required to equally match the funding provided by this Act, and the FRA is not authorized to obligate federal funds until the state match is guaranteed. Section 302: RRIF process improvements The FRA administers the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) program, which provides long-term, low-interest loans for railroad-related improvements. While this program is authorized to provide up to $35 billion in lending, nearly all of it remains unused. This lack of uptake stems in part from FRA’s slow, cumbersome approval process. This section makes several improvements to the RRIF loan program, including limiting the Office of Management and Budget review period for loan approval and setting a 45-day timeframe fordetermining application completion. States are allowed more flexibility in determining collateral offered to secure loans and addsPositive Train Control projects to the list of projects given preference in the approval process. The section also includes an annual report to Congress on RRIF program activities. Section 303. NEC fast forward The RRIF program is one way the federal government can partner with the states and Amtrak to advance large infrastructure projects that are difficult to carry out with annual appropriations. In particular, the Northeast Corridor, with its proven passenger rail and commuter rail ridership, is an ideal area to use the RRIFprogram to address needed improvements. PRRIA dedicates a significant portion of the RRIF program to the NEC to incentivize states and localities to come to the table and seek loans to advance projects of national and regional significance. This section directs the Secretary, as part of the RRIF program, to provide direct loans and loan guarantees to eligible entities forcapital projects to improve the NEC. It also requires the Government Accountability Office to submit a report to Congress identifying potential revenue sources, projects, and service improvements that could be achieved by RRIF capital improvements programs. This section also increases the comment period on certain waiver determinations from 15 to 30 days and requires the Secretary to submit an annual report on such waivers to Congress. Finally, it allows provisions used in FRA grant programs to be applied to the RRIF loan program. Section 304. Large capital project requirements This section prevents the Secretary from obligating a grant through the High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Programs in excess of $1 billion unless the applicant is able to demonstrate to the Secretary that the non-federal share is committed, the project will result in a useable segment, and the applicant submits certain information to the Secretary on the project, including the project’s anticipated benefits. These provisions will ensure that the federal funding for the project is being used efficiently and effectively to achieve the intended goals of the program. Furthermore, it requires the Secretary to ensure that the project is maintained to the level of utility that is necessary to support the benefits approved by the Secretary for a period of 20 years from the date the project is placed in service. If the project is not maintained for a period of time in excess of 12 months, then a pro-rata share of the federal contribution shall be refunded. Section 305. Small business participation study This section requires the Secretary to conduct a nationwide disparity and availability study on the use of small business concerns owned and controlled by socially- and economically-disadvantagedindividuals in publicly funded intercity passenger rail projects administered by the FRA. Section 306. Gulf Coast rail service working group This section requires the FRA to convene a working group to evaluate the restoration of intercity rail passenger service in the Gulf Coast Region between New Orleans, Louisiana and Orlando, Florida. Section 307. Miscellaneous This section amends Title 49, United States Code in order to make technical corrections. TITLE IV — PROJECT DELIVERY Section 401. Project delivery rulemaking PRIIA 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) changed FRA’s primary focus from being a safety agency to include being a major grant-maker. ARRA provided $8 billion in federal funding for High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail grants to states for various passenger rail projects. These projects require environmental reviews to comply with NEPA, yet the FRA still has no regulations on environmental review, only a Federal Register notice from May 1999 predating the addition of itssubstantial grant-making duties. However, prior transportation authorizations for other modal administrations within the DOTstreamlined environmental review processes for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) leaving FRA’s processes several iterations behind these agencies. States have expressed concerns with this lack of guidance and about the discrepancies in the environmental review processes of the separate intermodal agencies, particularly when a project crosses multiple jurisdictions.Because environmental reviews of rail projects can require participation by multiple agencies, if participation in the process isdone sequentially, a delay at one agency can have cascading dilatory effects throughout the process. Further, without deadlines, environmental reviews can be delayed simply because no agency action was taken. The bill addresses these concerns by requiring the Secretary to issue a rulemaking to govern the environmental review, permitting, and approval or disapproval of freight railroad,intercity rail passenger, and certain commuter rail passenger infrastructure projects. The rulemaking is to include procedures for creating process efficiencies, such as conducting concurrent reviews, establishing deadlines for decisions, providing for improved agency coordination, and considering expanded categorical exclusions. Section 402. Historic preservation of railroads PRIIA 2008 mandated that the FRA study ways to streamline compliance with section 106 of the National Historic PreservationAct and section 303 of Title 49 for rail infrastructure projects. Concerns have been raised regarding, among other things, the length of time added to project reviews as a result of compliance with those laws and the lack of uniformity in how historic preservation reviews were conducted by the requisite entities for rail projects. The FRA submitted its report to Congress in March 2013 outliningthe administrative and legislative actions that could be taken to reduce timelines and improve reviews. This section builds upon thatreport and requires the Secretary to pursue administrative program alternatives to promote a consistent approach to the treatment of railroads for historic preservation purposes, and to consider, among other options, the development of programmaticagreements, program comments, exempted categories of undertakings, and guidance for historical reviews. Further, the Secretarymust develop mechanisms for streamlining compliance with the requirements of section 303 reviews for railroad and rail-relatedproperties and shall consider, among other options, the development of programmatic evaluations, de minimis impact determinations, and regulatory guidance. TITLE V — MISCELLANEOUS Section 501. Definitions This section amends Title 49 to insert several definitions to conform to changes made elsewhere in the Act. C HANGES IN E XISTING L AW M ADE BY THE B ILL , AS R EPORTED In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill,as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italic, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): TITLE 49, UNITED STATES CODE * * * * * * * ### SUBTITLE V—RAIL PROGRAMS * * * * * * * ### PART B—ASSISTANCE * * * * * * * CHAPTER 221—LOCAL RAIL FREIGHT ASSISTANCE * * * * * * * § 22106. Limitations on financial assistance (a) * * * (b) S TATE U SE OF R EPAID F UNDS AND C ONTINGENT I NTEREST R E COVERIES .—The State shall place the United States Government’s share of money that is repaid and any contingent interest that isrecovered in an interest-bearing account. The repaid money, contingent interest, and any ø interest thereof ¿ interest thereon shall be considered to be State funds. The State shall use such funds to make other grants and loans, consistent with the purposes for which financial assistance may be used under subsection (a), as the State considers to be appropriate. * * * * * * * ### PART C—PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION * * * * * * * CHAPTER 241—GENERAL § 24101. Findings, mission, and goals (a) * * * (b) M ISSION .—The mission of Amtrak is to provide efficient and effective intercity passenger rail mobility consisting of high qualityservice that is trip-time competitive with other intercity travel options and that is consistent with the goals of ø subsection (d) ¿ subsection (c) . * * * * * * * § 24102. Definitions In this part— (1) * * * * * * * * * *(5) ‘‘long-distance route’’ means a route described in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (7). (6) ‘‘National Network’’ includes long-distance routes and State-supported routes. ø (5) ¿ (7) ‘‘national rail passenger transportation system’’ means— (A) * * * * * * * * * * ø (6) ¿ (8) ‘‘Northeast Corridor’’ means Connecticut, Delaware,the District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. ø (7) ¿ (9) ‘‘rail carrier’’ means a person, including a unit of State or local government, providing rail transportation for compensation. ø (8) ¿ (10) ‘‘rate’’ means a rate, fare, or charge for rail transportation. ø (9) ¿ (11) ‘‘regional transportation authority’’ means an entity established to provide passenger transportation in a region.(12) ‘‘state-of-good-repair’’ means a condition in which physical assets, both individually and as a system, are— (A) performing at a level at least equal to that called for in their as-built or as-modified design specification during any period when the life cycle cost of maintaining the assets is lower than the cost of replacing them; and(B) sustained through regular maintenance and replacement programs.(13) ‘‘State-supported route’’ means a route described in subparagraph (B) or (D) of paragraph (7), or in section 24702, thatis operated by Amtrak, excluding those trains operated by Amtrak on the routes described in paragraph (7)(A). * * * * * * * ø § 24104. Authorization of appropriations ø (a) I N G ENERAL .—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Transportation— ø (1) $1,138,000,000 for fiscal year 1998; ø (2) $1,058,000,000 for fiscal year 1999; ø (3) $1,023,000,000 for fiscal year 2000; ø (4) $989,000,000 for fiscal year 2001; and ø (5) $955,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, for the benefit of Amtrak for capital expenditures under chapters 243, 247, and 249 of this title, operating expenses, and paymentsdescribed in subsection (c)(1)(A) through (C). In fiscal years following the fifth anniversary of the enactment of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 no funds authorized for Amtrak shall be used for operating expenses other than those prescribed for tax liabilities under section 3221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that are more than the amount needed for benefits of individuals who retire from Amtrak and for their beneficiaries. ø (b) O PERATING E XPENSES .—(1) Not more than $381,000,000 may be appropriated to the Secretary for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1993, and September 30, 1994, for the benefit of Amtrak for operating expenses. Not more than 5 percent of theamounts appropriated for each fiscal year shall be used to pay operating expenses under section 24704 of this title for transportation in operation on September 30, 1992. ø (2)(A) Not more than the following amounts may be appropriated to the Secretary for the benefit of Amtrak for operating losses under section 24704 of this title for transportation beginning after September 30, 1992: ø (i) $7,500,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993. ø (ii) $9,500,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994. ø (B) The expenditure by Amtrak of an amount appropriated under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph is deemed not to be anoperating expense when calculating the revenue-to-operating expense ratio of Amtrak. ø (c) M ANDATORY P AYMENTS .—(1) Not more than $150,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and amounts that may be necessary for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, may be appropriated to the Secretary to pay— ø (A) tax liabilities under section 3221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3221) due in those fiscal years that are more than the amount needed for benefits for individuals who retire from Amtrak and for their beneficiaries; ø (B) obligations of Amtrak under section 8(a) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. 358(a)) due in thosefiscal years that are more than obligations of Amtrak calculated on an experience-related basis; and ø (C) obligations of Amtrak due under section 3321 of the Code (26 U.S.C. 3321). ø (2) Amounts appropriated under this subsection are not a United States Government subsidy of Amtrak. ø (d) P AYMENT TO AMTRAK .—Amounts appropriated under this section shall be paid to Amtrak under the budget request of the Secretary as approved or modified by Congress when the amounts are appropriated. A payment may not be made more frequently than once every 90 days, unless Amtrak, for good cause, requests more frequent payment before a 90-day period ends. In each fiscal year in which amounts are authorized to be appropriated underthis section, amounts appropriated shall be paid to Amtrak as follows: ø (1) 50 percent on October 1. ø (2) 25 percent on January 1. ø (3) 25 percent on April 1. ø (e) A VAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS AND E ARLY A PPROPRIATIONS .—(1)Amounts appropriated under this section remain available until expended. ø (2) Amounts for capital acquisitions and improvements may be appropriated in a fiscal year before the fiscal year in which the amounts will be obligated. ø (f) L IMITATIONS ON U SE .—Amounts appropriated under this section may not be used to subsidize operating losses of commuter rail passenger or rail freight transportation. ¿ * * * * * * * CHAPTER 243—AMTRAK Sec. 24301. Status and applicable laws. * * * * * * * 24316. ø Plan to assist ¿ Plans to address needs of families of passengers involved in rail passenger accidents. 24317. Costs and revenues. 24318. Grant process. 24319. Accounts. 24320. 5-year budget and business plan. 24321. Food and beverage reform. * * * * * * * § 24317. Costs and revenues (a) I N G ENERAL .—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, Amtrak shall establish and maintain internal controls to ensure Amtrak’s costs and revenues are allocated to either the Northeast CorVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING23 ridor or the National Network, including proportional shares of common and fixed costs. (b) D EFINITION.—For purposes of this chapter, the term ‘‘Northeast Corridor’’ means the Northeast Corridor main line between Boston, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and facilities and services used to operate and maintain that line. § 24318. Grant process (a) P ROCEDURES FOR G RANT R EQUESTS .—Not later than 30 daysafter the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, the Secretary of Transportation shall establishand transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate substantive and procedural requirements, including schedules, for grant requests under this section. (b) G RANT R EQUESTS .—Amtrak shall transmit grant requests forFederal funds to be appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak to— (1) the Secretary; and (2) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure andthe Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate. (c) C ONTENTS .—A grant request under subsection (b) shall—(1) provide a detailed financial analysis for the upcoming fiscal year for the Northeast Corridor, State-supported routes, and long-distance routes, including projections for the items listed in 24320(c)(1), as applicable, in comparison to prior fiscal year projections; (2) include a description of the work to be funded, along with cost estimates and an estimated timetable for completion of the projects covered by the request; (3) include an assessment of the continuing financial stability of Amtrak; (4) be displayed on Amtrak’s website within a reasonable timeframe following its submission to the entities described in subsection (b); and (5) be in similar format and substance to those submitted by executive agencies of the Federal Government. (d) R EVIEW AND A PPROVAL .— (1) 30- DAY APPROVAL PROCESS .—The Secretary shall completethe review of a grant request and approve or disapprove the request not later than 30 days after the date on which Amtraksubmits the grant request. If the Secretary disapproves the request or determines that the request is incomplete or deficient,the Secretary shall include the reason for disapproval or the incomplete items or deficiencies in a notice to Amtrak. (2) 15- DAY MODIFICATION PERIOD .—Not later than 15 days after receiving notification from the Secretary under paragraph (1), Amtrak shall submit a modified request for the Secretary’s review. (3) R EVISED REQUESTS .—Not later than 15 days after receiving a modified request from Amtrak, the Secretary shall either approve the modified request, or, if the Secretary finds that therequest is still incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall identify in writing to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate the remaining deficiencies and recommend a process for resolving the outstanding portions of the request. (e) P AYMENT TO A MTRAK .— (1) I N GENERAL .—Except as provided in paragraph (2), ineach fiscal year for which amounts are authorized to be appropriated, amounts appropriated shall be paid to Amtrak as follows: (A) 50 percent on October 1. (B) 25 percent on January 1. (C) 25 percent on April 1. (2) E XCEPTION.—The Secretary may make a payment to Amtrak of appropriated funds more frequently than once every 90 days if Amtrak, for good cause, requests more frequent payment before a 90-day period ends. (f) A VAILABILITY OF A MOUNTS AND E ARLY A PPROPRIATIONS .— Amounts appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak shall remain available until expended. Amounts for capital acquisitions and improvements may be appropriated for a fiscal year before the fiscal year in which the amounts will be obligated. (g) L IMITATIONS ON U SE .—Amounts appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak may not be used to subsidize operating losses of commuter rail passenger or rail freight transportation. § 24319. Accounts (a) E STABLISHMENT OF A CCOUNTS .—Amtrak shall establish— (1) a Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account; and (2) a National Network account. (b) N ORTHEAST C ORRIDOR I MPROVEMENT F UND A CCOUNT .— (1) D EPOSITS .—Amtrak shall deposit in the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account established under subsection (a)(1)— (A) grant funds appropriated for the Northeast CorridorImprovement Fund pursuant to section 101(a) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 or any subsequent Act; (B) compensation received from commuter rail passengertransportation on the Northeast Corridor provided to Amtrak pursuant to section 24905(c); and (C) any operating surplus of the Northeast Corridor, as allocated pursuant to section 24317. (2) U SE OF NORTHEAST CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT FUND AC COUNT.—Except as provided in subsection (d), amounts deposited in the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund account shall be made available for the use of Amtrak for— (A) capital projects described in section 24401(2) (A) or(B) to bring the Northeast Corridor to a state-of-good-repair, including projects described in section 24906(a)(2)(E)(i)(I); (B) capital projects intended to increase corridor capacity, improve service reliability, and reduce travel time for railusers on the Northeast Corridor, including projects described in subclauses (II) and (III) of section24906(a)(2)(E)(i), consistent with the planning process established under section 24906; and (C) retirement of principal and payment of interest on loans for capital equipment, or capital leases, attributable to the Northeast Corridor. (c) N ATIONAL N ETWORK A CCOUNT .— (1) D EPOSITS .—Amtrak shall deposit in the account established under subsection (a)(2)— (A) grant funds appropriated for the National Network pursuant to section 101(b) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, or any subsequent Act;(B) compensation received from States provided to Amtrak pursuant to section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 24101 note); and (C) any operating surplus from the National Network, as allocated pursuant to section 24317. (2) U SE OF NATIONAL NETWORK ACCOUNT.—Except as provided in subsection (d), amounts deposited in the National Network account shall be made available for the use of Amtrak for capital expenses and operating costs of the National Network and retirement of principal and payment of interest on loans forcapital equipment, or capital leases, attributable to the National Network. (d) T RANSFER A UTHORITY .— (1) A UTHORITY.—Amtrak may transfer any funds appropriated pursuant to the Passenger Rail Reform and InvestmentAct of 2014 or any other Act, or any surplus generated by operations, between the Northeast Corridor Improvement Fund and National Network accounts upon the expiration of 60 days after Amtrak has notified the Amtrak Board of Directors of such transfer. (2) R EPORT .—Not later than 30 days after the Amtrak Board of Directors receives notification from Amtrak under paragraph(1), the Board shall transmit a report to the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, that includes— (A) the amount of the transfer; and (B) a detailed explanation of the reason for the transfer, including effects on Amtrak services if no transfer were made. (e) LETTERS OF I NTENT .— (1) R EQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall issue a letter of intent to Amtrak announcing an intention to obligate, for a major capital project described in subclauses (II) and (III) of section24906(a)(2)(E)(i), an amount from future available budget authority specified in law that is not more than the amount stipulated as the financial participation of the Secretary in the project. (2) N OTICE TO CONGRESS .—At least 30 days before issuing a letter under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall notify in writing the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportationand the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, of the proposed letter. The Secretary shall include with the notification a copy of the proposed letter, the criteria used for selecting the project for a grant award, and a description of how the project meets criteria of this section. (3) C ONTINGENT NATURE OF OBLIGATION OR COMMITMENT .— An obligation or administrative commitment may be made only when amounts are appropriated. The letter of intent shall statethat the contingent commitment is not an obligation of the Federal Government, and is subject to the availability of appropriations under Federal law and to Federal laws in force or enacted after the date of the contingent commitment. (f) R OLLING S TOCK P URCHASES .—Prior to entering into contracts in excess of $100,000,000 for rolling stock procurements, Amtrakshall submit a business case analysis to the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, on the utility of such purchase. This analysis shall— (1) include a cost and benefit comparison that describes thetotal lifecycle costs and the anticipated benefits related to revenue, operational efficiency, reliability, and other factors; (2) set forth the total payments by fiscal year; (3) identify the specific source and amounts of funding for each payment, including Federal funds, State funds, Amtrak profits, Federal, State, or private loans or loan guarantees, and other funding;(4) include whether any payment under the contract will increase Amtrak’s grant request, as required under section 24318, in that particular fiscal year; and (5) describe how Amtrak will adjust the procurement if future funding is not available. § 24320. 5-year capital and operating plan (a) P LAN .—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of an Act appropriating funds pursuant to section 101 of the PassengerRail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, or any subsequent authorization of appropriations for the same purposes, the Amtrak Boardof Directors shall prepare and transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate a 5-year capital and operating plan for the Northeast Corridor and National Network. (b) C ONSULTATION.—Each such plan shall be prepared in consultation with— (1) the Federal Railroad Administration;(2) the Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission, with respect to the Northeast Corridor; and (3) the requisite States, with respect to the National Network. (c) C ONTENTS .—A plan prepared under this section shall—(1) for each of the Northeast Corridor and the National Network, include— (A) projected revenues and expenditures for the Northeast Corridor, State-supported routes, long-distance routes, and corporate development, including Federal and non-Federal funding sources; (B) projected ridership levels for the Northeast Corridor, State-supported routes, and long-distance routes;(C) projected capital and operational funding requirements necessary to maintain passenger service in order to accommodate predicted ridership levels and predicted sources of Federal and non-Federal funding;(D) projected capital and operating requirements, ridership, revenue, and expenditures for new passenger service operations or service expansions; (E) an assessment of the continuing financial stability ofAmtrak, as indicated by factors including anticipated Federal funding of capital and operating costs, Amtrak’s ability to efficiently recruit, retain, and manage its workforce, and Amtrak’s ability to effectively provide passenger rail service;(F) estimates of long-term and short-term debt and associated principal and interest payments (both current and anticipated); (G) annual cash flow forecasts; (H) a statement describing methods of estimation and significant assumptions;(I) specific measures that demonstrate measurable improvement year over year in the financial results of Amtrak’s operations; (J) prior fiscal year and projected—(i) operating ratio, cash operating loss, and cash operating loss per passenger on a route, business line, and corporate basis; (ii) specific costs and savings estimates resulting from reform initiatives; (iii) productivity statistics on a route, business line, and corporate basis; and (iv) equipment reliability statistics;(K) capital and operating expenditures for anticipated security needs; and (L) a prioritization of capital expenditures by business line; and (2) reflect the Northeast Corridor planning, as applicable, and grant processes established under sections 24906 and 24318. (d) C ONFORMANCE TO A UTHORIZED F UNDING LEVELS .— (1) I N GENERAL .—Except as provided in paragraph (2), any financial projection for a fiscal year that is included in a plan prepared under this section shall be based on the amount of dedicated funding for such fiscal year. (2) A BSENCE OF APPROPRIATION.—In the absence of an appropriation of funds for such fiscal year, the projection shall be based on the amount of funds authorized by law to be appropriated for that fiscal year, plus other dedicated funding. (3) D EDICATED FUNDING DEFINED .—In this subsection, the term ‘‘dedicated funding’’ means any amounts appropriated for a fiscal year and any other funding sources, including revenues and other ancillary funding streams, for the Northeast Corridor or the National Network. (e) S TANDARDS T O P ROMOTE F INANCIAL S TABILITY .—In preparing a plan under this section, the Board shall apply sound budgetarypractices, including reducing costs and other expenditures, improving productivity, increasing revenues, or combinations of such practices. (f) U PDATES .—Amtrak shall provide monthly reports for the current fiscal year in electronic format to the Secretary and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee onAppropriations of the Senate regarding the items described in subsection (c)(1), which shall include a description of the work completed to date, any differences from projections, and the reasons for such differences. § 24321. Food and beverage reform (a) P LAN .—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, Amtrak shall develop and begin implementing a plan to eliminate, within 5 years of such date of enactment, the operating loss associated with providing food and beverage service on board Amtrak trains. (b) C ONSIDERATIONS .—In developing and implementing the plan,Amtrak shall consider a combination of cost management and revenue generation initiatives, including— (1) scheduling optimization; (2) on-board logistics; (3) product development and supply chain efficiency; (4) training, awards, and accountability; (5) technology enhancements and process improvements; and (6) ticket revenue allocation. (c) S AVINGS C LAUSE .—Amtrak shall ensure that no Amtrak employee holding a position as of the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014 is involuntarily separated because of— (1) the development and implementation of the plan required under subsection (a); or (2) any other action taken by Amtrak to implement this section. (d) N O F EDERAL F UNDING FOR O PERATING L OSSES .—Beginningon the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, no Federal funds may be used to cover any operating loss associated with providingfood and beverage service on a route operated by Amtrak or an alternative passenger rail service provider that operates a route in lieu of Amtrak pursuant to section 24711. (e) R EPORT .—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactmentof the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, and annually thereafter for 5 years, Amtrak shall transmit to the ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING29 mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing the plan developed pursuant to subsection (a) and a description of progress in the implementation of the plan. * * * * * * * CHAPTER 244—INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE CORRIDOR CAPITAL ASSISTANCE Sec. 24401. Definitions. * * * * * * *24407. Federal-State partnership for Northeast Corridor rehabilitation and improvement. * * * * * * * § 24402. Capital investment grants to support intercity passenger rail service (a) * * * * * * * * * * (m) L ARGE C APITAL P ROJECT R EQUIREMENTS .— (1) I N GENERAL .—For a grant awarded under this chapter for an amount in excess of $1,000,000,000, the following conditions shall apply: (A) The Secretary of Transportation shall not obligateany funding unless the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that it has committed and will be able to fulfill the non-Federal share required for the grantwithin the applicant’s proposed project completion timetable. (B) The Secretary shall not obligate any funding for workactivities that occur after the completion of final design unless— (i) the applicant transmits to the Secretary a financial plan that generally identifies the sources of thenon-Federal funding required for any subsequent segments or phases of the corridor service development program covering the project for which the grant is made; (ii) the grant will result in a useable segment, atransportation facility, or equipment, that has operational independence; and (iii) the intercity passenger rail benefits anticipatedto result from the grant, such as increased speed, improved on-time performance, reduced trip time, increased frequencies, new service, safety improvements,improved accessibility, or other significant enhancements are detailed by the grantee and approved by the Secretary.(C) The Secretary shall ensure that the project is maintained to the level of utility that is necessary to support the benefits approved under subparagraph (B)(iii) for a periodof 20 years from the date the useable segment, transporVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Dec 03, 2014 Jkt 049006 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR629.XXX HR629emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING30 tation facility, or equipment described in subparagraph (B)(ii) is placed in service. If the project property is not maintained as required by this subparagraph for a period of time in excess of 12 months, then a pro-rata share of the Federal contribution, based upon the percentage remaining of the 20-year period that commenced when the project property was placed in service, shall be refunded. (2) E ARLY WORK .—The Secretary may allow a grantee subject to this subsection to engage in at-risk work activities subsequent to the conclusion of final design where the Secretary determines that such work activities are reasonable and necessary. * * * * * * * § 24405. Grant conditions (a) B UY AMERICA .—(1) * * * * * * * * * * (4) If the Secretary determines that it is necessary to waive the application of paragraph (1) based on a finding under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall, before the date on which such finding takes effect— (A) * * * (B) provide notice of such finding and an opportunity for public comment on such finding for a reasonable period of time not to exceed ø 15 days ¿ 30 days . * * * * * * *(12) Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, and annuallythereafter, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report listing any waiver issued under this section during the preceding year. * * * * * * * § 24407. Federal-State partnership for Northeast Corridor rehabilitation and improvement (a) I N G ENERAL .—The Secretary of Transportation shall develop and implement a program for issuing grants to applicants, on a competitive basis, for the purpose of financing the capital projects included in the Northeast Corridor Priority Project List developed under subsection (c). (b) D EFINITIONS .—In this section, the following definitions apply: (1) A PPLICANT.—The term ‘‘applicant’’ means a State (including the District of Columbia), a group of States, an Interstate Compact, or a public agency established by one or more States and having responsibility for providing intercity passenger or commuter rail service. (2) M AJOR STATE - OF - GOOD - REPAIR PROJECT .—The term‘‘major state-of-good-repair project’’ means a capital project primarily intended to replace, rehabilitate or repair major Northeast Corridor infrastructure assets utilized for providing intercity rail passenger transportation, including tunnels, bridges, stations, and other assets as determined by the Secretary. (3) I MPROVEMENT PROJECT .—The term ‘‘improvement project’’ means a capital project primarily intended to improve intercitypassenger rail performance on the Northeast Corridor, including reduced trip times, increased train frequencies, higher operating speeds, and other improvements as determined by the Secretary. (c) N ORTHEAST C ORRIDOR P RIORITY P ROJECT L IST.—The Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission,established under section 24905, shall develop and approve a Northeast Corridor Priority Project List that shall include— (1) a list of prioritized individual major state-of-good-repair projects and improvement projects along the Northeast Corridor that— (A) can be completed based on— (i) the funding authorized under section 103(b) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014; (ii) any subsequent applicable authorization in effect; (iii) in the absence of such an authorization, a 5-yearfunding amount based on the most recent appropriation; or (iv) the requirements of subsection (d); and(B) are consistent with the Northeast Corridor capital investment plan required under section 24906(a); (2) an identification of the applicant for each individual project; (3) an identification of the sources of non-Federal matching funds for each project; and (4) a description of the benefits each project will bring to intercity rail passenger services. (d) U SE OF F UNDS .—The Federal grants authorized under this section shall be for no more than 50 percent of the net project cost of the project involved. (e) A PPLICABILITY OF C APITAL G RANT R EQUIREMENTS .—Except asspecifically provided in this section, the use of any amounts appropriated for grants under this section shall be subject to the requirements of this chapter. (f) M ATCH R EQUIREMENTS .—No grants may be obligated to an applicant under this section unless the applicant has transmitted to the Secretary of Transportation a binding written commitment to provide all amounts necessary for the purpose of matching Federal contributions as required by this section. (g) U PDATES TO L IST .—The Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission shall revise the NEC Priority Project List as necessary to reflect— (1) any differences in the availability of Federal funding from the levels assumed for purposes of subsection (c)(1)(A) (i) and (ii); (2) any elimination or addition of projects; and (3) any reduction or increase in benefits to be derived from a project. (h) A VAILABILITY .—Amounts appropriated for carrying out this section shall remain available until expended. (i) S AVINGS C LAUSE .—Nothing in this section shall supplant therequirement of applicants to compensate Amtrak for the use of Amtrak facilities or services pursuant to section 24905(c). (j) D EFINITION .—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘Northeast Corridor’’ means the Northeast Corridor main line between Boston, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and the Northeast Corridor branch lines connecting to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,Springfield, Massachusetts, and Spuyten Duyvil, New York, and facilities and services used to operate and maintain those lines. * * * * * * * CHAPTER 247—AMTRAK ROUTE SYSTEM Sec. 24701. National rail passenger transportation system. * * * * * * * 24712. State-supported routes. * * * * * * * § 24706. Discontinuance (a) N OTICE OF D ISCONTINUANCE .—(1) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, at least 180 days before ø a discontinuance under section 24704 or or ¿ discontinuing service over a route, Amtrak shall give notice of the discontinuance in the way Amtrak decides will give a State, a regional or local authority, or another person the opportunity to agree to share or assume the cost of any part of the train, route, or service to be discontinued. (2) Notice of the discontinuance under ø section 24704 or ¿ paragraph (1) shall be posted in all stations served by the train to be discontinued at least 14 days before the discontinuance. (b) D ISCONTINUANCE FOR L ACK OF A PPROPRIATIONS .—(1) Amtrak may discontinue service under ø section 24704 or ¿ subsection (a)(1) during— (A) * * * * * * * * * * ø § 24711. Alternate passenger rail service pilot program ø (a) I N G ENERAL .—Within 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008, theFederal Railroad Administration shall complete a rulemaking proceeding to develop a pilot program that— ø (1) permits a rail carrier or rail carriers that own infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a passenger rail service route described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of section 24102(5)or in section 24702 to petition the Administration to be considered as a passenger rail service provider over that route in lieu of Amtrak for a period not to exceed 5 years after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008; ø (2) requires the Administration to notify Amtrak within 30days after receiving a petition under paragraph (1) and establish a deadline by which both the petitioner and Amtrak would be required to submit a bid to provide passenger rail service over the route to which the petition relates; ø (3) requires that each bid describe how the bidder would operate the route, what Amtrak passenger equipment would be needed, if any, what sources of non-Federal funding the bidder would use, including any State subsidy, among other things; ø (4) requires the Administration to select winning bidders by evaluating the bids against the financial and performancemetrics developed under section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 and to give preference in awarding contracts to bidders seeking to operate routes thathave been identified as one of the five worst performing Amtrak routes under section 24710; ø (5) requires the Administration to execute a contract within a specified, limited time after the deadline established under paragraph (2) and award to the winning bidder— ø (A) the right and obligation to provide passenger railservice over that route subject to such performance standards as the Administration may require, consistent withthe standards developed under section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008; and ø (B) an operating subsidy— ø (i) for the first year at a level not in excess of thelevel in effect during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which the petition was received, adjusted for inflation; ø (ii) for any subsequent years at such level, adjusted for inflation; and ø (6) requires that each bid contain a staffing plan describing the number of employees needed to operate the service, the jobassignments and requirements, and the terms of work for prospective and current employees of the bidder for the service outlined in the bid, and such staffing plan be made available by the winning bidder to the public after the bid award. ø (b) R OUTE L IMITATIONS .—The Administration may not make the program available with respect to more than 2 Amtrak intercity passenger rail routes. ø (c) P ERFORMANCE S TANDARDS ; A CCESS TO F ACILITIES ; E MPLOY EES .—If the Administration awards the right and obligation to provide passenger rail service over a route under the program to a rail carrier or rail carriers— ø (1) it shall execute a contract with the rail carrier or railcarriers for rail passenger operations on that route that conditions the operating and subsidy rights upon— ø (A) the service provider continuing to provide passenger rail service on the route that is no less frequent, nor overa shorter distance, than Amtrak provided on that route before the award; and ø (B) the service provider’s compliance with the minimum standards established under section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 and such additional performance standards as the Administration may establish; ø (2) it shall, if the award is made to a rail carrier other than Amtrak, require Amtrak to provide access to its reservation system, stations, and facilities directly related to operations to any rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a contract under this section, in accordance with section 217 of that Act, necessary to carry out the purposes of this section; ø (3) the employees of any person used by a rail carrier or railcarriers (as defined in section 10102(5) of this title) in the operation of a route under this section shall be considered an employee of that carrier or carriers and subject to the applicableFederal laws and regulations governing similar crafts or classes of employees of Amtrak, including provisions under section121 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 relating to employees that provide food and beverage service; and ø (4) the winning bidder shall provide hiring preference to qualified Amtrak employees displaced by the award of the bid, consistent with the staffing plan submitted by the bidder and shall be subject to the grant conditions under section 24405 of this title. ø (d) C ESSATION OF S ERVICE .—If a rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a route under this section cease to operate the service or fail to fulfill their obligations under the contract required under subsection (c), the Administrator, in collaboration with the Surface Transportation Board, shall take any necessary action consistentwith this title to enforce the contract and ensure the continued provision of service, including the installment of an interim serviceprovider and re-bidding the contract to operate the service. The entity providing service shall either be Amtrak or a rail carrier defined in subsection (a)(1). ø (e) A DEQUATE R ESOURCES .—Before taking any action allowedunder this section, the Secretary shall certify that the Administrator has sufficient resources that are adequate to undertake the program established under this section. ¿ § 24711. Alternate passenger rail service pilot program (a) I N G ENERAL .—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, theFederal Railroad Administration shall complete a rulemaking proceeding to develop a pilot program that—(1) permits a rail carrier or rail carriers that own infrastructure over which Amtrak operates a passenger rail service route described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of section 24102(5)or in section 24702(a) to petition the Federal Railroad Administration to be considered as a passenger rail service provider over that route in lieu of Amtrak for an operations period of 5 years; (2) requires the Federal Railroad Administration to notifyAmtrak within 30 days after receiving a petition under paragraph (1) and establish a deadline by which both the petitionerand Amtrak would be required to submit a bid to provide passenger rail service over the route to which the petition relates;(3) requires that each bid describe how the bidder would operate the route, what Amtrak passenger equipment would be needed, if any, and what sources of non-Federal funding the bidder would use, including any State subsidy, among other things; (4) requires the Federal Railroad Administration to execute acontract within a specified, limited time after the deadline established under paragraph (2) and award to the winning bidder— (A) the right and obligation to provide passenger railservice over that route subject to such performance standards as the Federal Railroad Administration may require; and (B) an operating subsidy—(i) for the first year at a level not in excess of 90 percent of the level in effect for that specific route during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which the petition was received, adjusted for inflation; and (ii) for any subsequent years at the level calculated under clause (i), adjusted for inflation; and (5) requires that each bid contain a staffing plan describing the number of employees needed to operate the service, the jobassignments and requirements, and the terms of work for prospective and current employees of the bidder for the service outlined in the bid, and that such staffing plan be made available by the winning bidder to the public after the bid award. (b) R OUTE L IMITATIONS .—The Federal Railroad Administration may not make the program available with respect to more than 2 Amtrak intercity passenger rail routes. (c) P ERFORMANCE S TANDARDS ; A CCESS TO F ACILITIES ; EMPLOY EES .—If the Federal Railroad Administration awards the right and obligation to provide passenger rail service over a route under this section to a rail carrier or rail carriers—(1) it shall execute a contract with the rail carrier or rail carriers for rail passenger operations on that route that conditions the operating and subsidy rights on— (A) the service provider continuing to provide passenger rail service on the route that is no less frequent, nor overa shorter distance, than Amtrak provided on that route before the award; and (B) the service provider’s compliance with the standards established under subsection (a)(4)(A), and such additionalperformance standards as the Administration may establish; (2) it shall, if the award is made to a rail carrier other thanAmtrak, require Amtrak to provide access to its reservation system, stations, and facilities directly related to operations to any rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a contract under this section, in accordance with subsection (d), necessary to carry out the purposes of this section; (3) an employee of any person used by such rail carrier or rail carriers in the operation of a route under this section shall be considered an employee of that carrier or carriers and subjectto the applicable Federal laws and regulations governing similar crafts or classes of employees of Amtrak, including provisions under section 121 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 (49 U.S.C. 4312 note) relating to employees that provide food and beverage service; and (4) the winning bidder shall provide hiring preference to qualified Amtrak employees displaced by the award of the bid, consistent with the staffing plan submitted by the bidder, and shall be subject to the grant conditions under section 24405 of this title. (d) D ISPUTES .—If Amtrak and the rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a route under this section cannot agree upon terms to carry out subsection (c)(2), and the Surface Transportation Boardfinds that access to Amtrak’s facilities or equipment, or the provision of services by Amtrak, is necessary to carry out subsection (c)(2)and that the operation of Amtrak’s other services will not be impaired thereby, the Surface Transportation Board shall, within 120days after submission of the dispute, issue an order that the facilities and equipment be made available, and that services be provided, by Amtrak, and shall determine reasonable compensation, liability, and other terms for use of the facilities and equipment and provision of the services. (e) C ESSATION OF SERVICE .—If a rail carrier or rail carriers awarded a route under this section cease to operate the service or fail to fulfill their obligations under the contract required undersubsection (c), the Federal Railroad Administration, in collaboration with the Surface Transportation Board, shall take any necessary action consistent with this title to enforce the contract and ensure the continued provision of service, including the installment of an interim service provider and rebidding the contract to operate the service. The entity providing service shall either be Amtrak or a rail carrier defined in subsection (a)(1). (f) ADEQUATE R ESOURCES .—Before taking any action allowedunder this section, the Secretary shall certify that the Federal Railroad Administration has sufficient resources appropriated under section 101(b) of Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, or any subsequent appropriation, for that purpose that are adequate to undertake the program established under this section. (g) B UDGET A UTHORITY .—The Secretary of Transportation mayprovide to a winning bidder selected under this section appropriations authorized under sections 101(b) of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, or any subsequent appropriation for the same purposes, necessary to cover the operating subsidy described in subsection (a)(4)(B). § 24712. State-supported routes (a) S TATE -S UPPORTED R OUTE ADVISORY C OMMITTEE .— (1) E STABLISHMENT .—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of2014, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a StateSupported Route Advisory Committee to promote mutual cooperation and planning pertaining to the rail operations and related activities of trains operated on State-supported routesand to further implement section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note). (2) M EMBERSHIP .—The Committee shall consist of representatives of— (A) Amtrak;(B) the Department of Transportation, including the Federal Railroad Administration; and (C) 7 States that sponsor State-supported routes, selectedby the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration on the basis of appropriate expertise and geographic balance, and in a manner that ensures that all appropriate States are represented periodically on the Committee. (3) D ISTRIBUTION OF MEMBERSHIP .—The membership belonging to any of the groups described in each individual subparagraph of paragraph (2) shall not constitute a majority of the Committee’s memberships. (4) M EETINGS ; RULES AND PROCEDURES .—The Committee shall establish a schedule and location for convening meetings,but shall meet no less than 2 times every fiscal year. The Committee shall develop rules and procedures to govern the Committee’s proceedings. (b) C OST , SERVICE , AND R IDERSHIP FORECASTS .— (1) I N GENERAL .—Not later than January 31, 2015, and annually thereafter, Amtrak shall transmit to each State that sponsors a State-supported route, and to the Committee onTransportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate— (A) a final statement of costs, revenues, ridership, and other information determined appropriate by the Committee established under subsection (a), pertaining to each such route for the prior fiscal year; and (B) a cost, service, and ridership forecast for each such route for the upcoming fiscal year, developed pursuant tothe methodology established under section 209 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 24101 note). (2) E XCEPTION .—The Committee may establish a different deadline than is required under paragraph (1) for submission of final financial statements and cost, service, and ridership forecasts. (3) Q UARTERLY UPDATES .—Beginning in 2015, and each year thereafter, Amtrak shall transmit to each State that sponsors a State-supported route quarterly updates of the cost, service, and ridership forecast described in paragraph (1)(B) to enable States to pace costs against State budgets, plan effectively, and address unexpected changes in costs in a timely manner, on the following dates: (A) April 30, for the period encompassing January through March of such year. (B) July 31, for the period encompassing April through June of such year. (C) October 31, for the period encompassing July through September of such year. (c) I NVOICES .—Not later than February 15, 2015, and monthlythereafter, Amtrak shall provide to each State that sponsors a Statesupported route a monthly invoice of the cost of operating such route, including fixed costs and third-party costs. (d) D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION .— (1) R EQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RESOLUTION .—If a dispute ariseswith respect to a forecast developed under subsection (b), an invoice developed under subsection (c), or the terms of a contractfor operation of a State-supported route negotiated between Amtrak and a State that sponsors the route, either Amtrak or theState may request that the Surface Transportation Board conduct expedited dispute resolution under this subsection. (2) P ROCEDURES .—The Surface Transportation Board shall establish procedures for expedited resolution of disputes brought before it under this subsection. (3) B INDING EFFECT.—The decision of the Surface Transportation Board under this subsection shall be binding on the parties to the dispute. (e) FRA A SSISTANCE .—The Federal Railroad Administration may provide assistance to the parties in the course of negotiations for a contract for operation of a State-supported route. (f) P ERFORMANCE M ETRICS .—In negotiating a contract for operation of a State-supported route, Amtrak and the State or Statesthat sponsor the route shall consider including provisions that provide penalties and incentives for performance based on metrics that take into account only those factors within the control of Amtrak or the State or States. (g) D EFINITION OF S TATE .—In this section, the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. * * * * * * * CHAPTER 249—NORTHEAST CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Sec. 24901. Definitions. * * * * * * * 24906. Northeast Corridor planning. * * * * * * * § 24906. Northeast Corridor planning (a) N ORTHEAST C ORRIDOR C APITAL I NVESTMENT P LAN .— (1) R EQUIREMENT .—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Actof 2014, and annually thereafter, the Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission establishedunder section 24905 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall develop a capital investment plan for the Northeast Corridor main line between Boston, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and the Northeast Corridor branch linesconnecting to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Springfield, Massachusetts, and Spuyten Duyvil, New York, and facilities and services used to operate and maintain those lines. (2) C ONTENTS .—Each such plan shall— (A) be developed to establish a coordinated approach to capital spending on the Northeast Corridor; (B) cover a period of 5 fiscal years, beginning with the first fiscal year after the date of the plan; (C) notwithstanding section 24902(b), prioritize projects and investments along the Northeast Corridor based on— (i) the anticipated benefits and costs of projects; (ii) the anticipated Federal and non-Federal funding available; and(iii) the information contained in the Northeast Corridor asset management plans required under subsection (b), once available; (D) ensure coordination and optimization across the entire Northeast Corridor and among the various owners and users; (E) include a financial plan for the investment period that— (i) categorizes each capital project as being primarily associated with— (I) normalized capital replacement; (II) replacement, rehabilitation, or repair of Northeast Corridor infrastructure assets, including tunnels, bridges, stations, and other assets; or (III) improvement of train performance on the Northeast Corridor, including reduced trip times, increased train frequencies, higher operating speeds, and other improvements;(ii) identifies the anticipated funding source and financing method for each capital project described in subclauses (II) and (III) of clause (i); (iii) describes the anticipated outcomes of each project, including—(I) an assessment of the potential effect on passenger accessibility, operations, safety, reliability, and resiliency, and on the ability of infrastructureowners and operators to meet regulatory requirements should the project not be funded; and (II) an assessment of the benefits and costs; (iv) identifies the extent to which the capital assets are or will be jointly used by intercity passenger rail service and other users, and the proportionate share of that joint usage; and(v) for projects that are expected to be fully or partially funded through Federal financial assistance, identifies the most appropriate public agency or entity to receive those funds and implement each capital project. (3) ADDITIONAL CONTENTS .—Any plan developed under paragraph (1) after the publication by the Secretary of Transportation of the Northeast Corridor service development plan shall also— (A) be developed to identify, prioritize, and phase the implementation of projects necessary to achieve the goals andfindings contained in such Northeast Corridor service development plan;(B) allow for flexibility to change prioritization and programs based upon the availability of Federal and non-Federal funding; (C) inform the Secretary in developing recommendations for Congress on Federal funding needs for the Northeast Corridor and any corresponding Federal investments in therespective capital programs for Northeast Corridor infrastructure owners and users; and(D) capture the network-level anticipated outcomes associated with plan implementation, including the anticipatedeffect on passenger accessibility, operations, safety, reliability, and resiliency. (b) N ORTHEAST C ORRIDOR A SSET M ANAGEMENT P LANS .— (1) C ONTENTS .—Amtrak, and States and public transportation entities that own infrastructure that supports or providesfor intercity rail passenger transportation on the Northeast Corridor, shall develop and update as necessary Northeast Corridor asset management plans for the Northeast Corridor mainline between Boston, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and the Northeast Corridor branch lines connecting to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Springfield, Massachusetts, and Spuyten Duyvil, New York, and facilities and services used to operate and maintain those lines, that—(A) are consistent with the Federal Transit Administration process, as authorized under section 5326, when implemented; (B) include, at a minimum—(i) an inventory of all capital assets owned by the developer of the plan; (ii) an assessment of the condition of each of those assets; (iii) a description of how the condition of each asset has changed since the previous iteration of the plan; and(iv) a description of the necessary resources and processes for bringing or maintaining those assets in a state-of-good repair, including decision support tools and investment prioritization methodologies. (2) T RANSMITTAL TO COMMISSION .—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, each entity described in paragraph (1)shall transmit to the Commission a plan developed under paragraph (1). Any updates to such plan shall also be transmitted to the Commission. (c) N ORTHEAST C ORRIDOR SERVICE D EVELOPMENT P LAN U P DATES .—The Commission shall, at least once every 10 years, update the Northeast Corridor service development plan. * * * * * * * PASSENGER RAIL INVESTMENT AND IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2008 * * * * * * * ## DIVISION B—AMTRAK * * * * * * * ## TITLE II—AMTRAK REFORM AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS * * * * * * * ø SEC. 204. DEVELOPMENT OF 5-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN. ø (a) D EVELOPMENT OF 5-Y EAR F INANCIAL P LAN .—The Amtrak Board of Directors shall submit an annual budget and business plan for Amtrak, and a 5-year financial plan for the fiscal year to which that budget and business plan relate and the subsequent 4 years, prepared in accordance with this section, to the Secretary and the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation no later than— ø (1) the first day of each fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act; or ø (2) the date that is 60 days after the date of enactment of an appropriations Act for the fiscal year, if later. ø (b) C ONTENTS OF 5-Y EAR F INANCIAL P LAN .—The 5-year financial plan for Amtrak shall include, at a minimum— ø (1) all projected revenues and expenditures for Amtrak, including governmental funding sources; ø (2) projected ridership levels for all Amtrak passenger operations; ø (3) revenue and expenditure forecasts for non-passenger operations; ø (4) capital funding requirements and expenditures necessary to maintain passenger service in order to accommodatepredicted ridership levels and predicted sources of capital funding; ø (5) operational funding needs, if any, to maintain currentand projected levels of passenger service, including State-supported routes and predicted funding sources; ø (6) projected capital and operating requirements, ridership,and revenue for any new passenger service operations or service expansions; ø (7) an assessment of the continuing financial stability of Amtrak, as indicated by factors such as anticipated Federalfunding of capital and operating costs, Amtrak’s ability to efficiently recruit, retain, and manage its workforce, and Amtrak’s ability to effectively provide passenger rail service; ø (8) estimates of long-term and short-term debt and associated principal and interest payments (both current and anticipated); ø (9) annual cash flow forecasts; ø (10) a statement describing methods of estimation and significant assumptions; ø (11) specific measures that demonstrate measurable improvement year over year in the financial results of Amtrak’s operations; ø (12) prior fiscal year and projected operating ratio, cash operating loss, and cash operating loss per passenger on a route, business line, and corporate basis; ø (13) prior fiscal year and projected specific costs and savings estimates resulting from reform initiatives; ø (14) prior fiscal year and projected labor productivity statistics on a route, business line, and corporate basis; ø (15) prior fiscal year and projected equipment reliability statistics; and ø (16) capital and operating expenditures for anticipated security needs. ø (c) S TANDARDS T O P ROMOTE F INANCIAL S TABILITY .—In meeting the requirements of subsection (b), Amtrak shall— ø (1) apply sound budgetary practices, including reducingcosts and other expenditures, improving productivity, increasing revenues, or combinations of such practices; ø (2) use the categories specified in the financial accountingand reporting system developed under section 203 when preparing its 5-year financial plan; and ø (3) ensure that the plan is consistent with the authorizations of appropriations under title I of this division. ø (d) R EVIEW BY DOT I NSPECTOR G ENERAL .—Within 60 days aftertheir submission by Amtrak, the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation shall review the annual budget and the 5-year financial plans prepared by Amtrak under this section to determine whether they meet the requirements of subsection (b) andshall furnish any relevant findings to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, theCommittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate. ¿ SEC. 205. RESTRUCTURING LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASES. (a) I N G ENERAL .—The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultationwith the Secretary and Amtrak, may make agreements to restructure Amtrak’s indebtedness ø as of the date of enactment of this Act. This authorization expires 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. ¿ , to the extent provided in advance in appropriations Acts. (b) D EBT R ESTRUCTURING .— ø The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation ¿ To the extent amounts are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary and Amtrak, shall enter into negotiations with the holders of Amtrak debt, including leases, outstanding ø as of the date of enactment of this Act ¿ for the purpose of restructuring (including repayment) and repaying that debt. The Secretary of the Treasury may secure agreements for restructuring or repayment on such terms as the Secretary of the Treasury deems favorable to the interests of the United States Government. * * * * * * * (d) P AYMENT OF R ENEGOTIATED D EBT .—If the criteria under subsection (c) are met, the Secretary of the Treasury may assume or repay the restructured debt, as appropriate , to the extent provided in advance in appropriations Acts . (e) AMTRAK P RINCIPAL AND I NTEREST P AYMENTS .— (1) P RINCIPAL ON DEBT SERVICE .—Unless the Secretary of theTreasury makes sufficient payments to creditors under subsection (d) so that Amtrak is required to make no payments tocreditors in a fiscal year, the Secretary shall use funds authorized ø by section 102 of this division ¿ for the use of Amtrak forretirement of principal or payment of interest on loans for capital equipment, or capital leases. (2) R EDUCTIONS IN AUTHORIZATION LEVELS .—Whenever action taken by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (a) results in reductions in amounts of principal or interest that Amtrak must service on existing debt, the corresponding amounts authorized ø by section 102 ¿ for Amtrak shall be reduced accordingly. (f) L EGAL E FFECT OF P AYMENTS U NDER T HIS S ECTION .—The payment of principal and interest on secured debt, other than debt assumed under subsection (d), with the proceeds of grants under subsection (e) shall not—(1) modify the extent or nature of any indebtedness of Amtrak to the United States in existence ø as of the date of enactment of this Act ¿ ; * * * * * * * ø SEC. 206. ESTABLISHMENT OF GRANT PROCESS. ø (a) G RANT R EQUESTS .—Amtrak shall submit grant requests (including a schedule for the disbursement of funds), consistent withthe requirements of this division, to the Secretary for funds authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for the use of Amtrak under sections 101(a), (b), and (c), 102, 219(b), and 302. ø (b) P ROCEDURES FOR G RANT R EQUESTS .—The Secretary shall establish substantive and procedural requirements, including schedules, for grant requests under this section not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act and shall transmit copiesof such requirements and schedules to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and theCommittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. As part of those requirements, the Secretary shall require, at a minimum, that Amtrak deposit grant funds, consistent with the appropriated amounts for each area of expenditure in a given fiscal year, in the following 2 accounts: ø (1) The Amtrak Operating account. ø (2) The Amtrak General Capital account. Amtrak may not transfer such funds to another account or expend such funds for any purpose other than the purposes covered by the account in which the funds are deposited without approval by the Secretary. ø (c) R EVIEW AND A PPROVAL .— ø (1) 30-D AY APPROVAL PROCESS .—The Secretary shall complete the review of a grant request (including the disbursement schedule) and approve or disapprove the request within 30days after the date on which Amtrak submits the grant request. If the Secretary disapproves the request or determines that the request is incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall include the reason for disapproval or the incomplete items or deficiencies in a notice to Amtrak. ø (2) 15-D AY MODIFICATION PERIOD .—Within 15 days after receiving notification from the Secretary under the precedingsentence, Amtrak shall submit a modified request for the Secretary’s review. ø (3) R EVISED REQUESTS .—Within 15 days after receiving amodified request from Amtrak, the Secretary shall either approve the modified request, or, if the Secretary finds that therequest is still incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall identify in writing to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate the remaining deficiencies and recommend a process for resolving the outstanding portions of the request. ¿ * * * * * * * ø SEC. 208. METHODOLOGIES FOR AMTRAK ROUTE AND SERVICE PLANNING DECISIONS. ø (a) M ETHODOLOGY D EVELOPMENT .—Within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Railroad Administrationshall obtain the services of a qualified independent entity to develop and recommend objective methodologies for Amtrak to use in determining what intercity passenger routes and services it will provide, including the establishment of new routes, the elimination of existing routes, and the contraction or expansion of services or frequencies over such routes. In developing such methodologies, the entity shall consider— ø (1) the current or expected performance and service quality of intercity passenger train operations, including cost recovery, on-time performance and minutes of delay, ridership, on-board services, stations, facilities, equipment, and other services; ø (2) connectivity of a route with other routes; ø (3) the transportation needs of communities and populations that are not well served by intercity passenger rail service or by other forms of intercity transportation; ø (4) Amtrak’s and other major intercity passenger rail service providers in other countries’ methodologies for determining intercity passenger rail routes and services; and ø (5) the views of the States and other interested parties. ø (b) S UBMITTAL TO C ONGRESS .—Within 1 year after the date ofenactment of this Act, the entity shall submit recommendations developed under subsection (a) to Amtrak, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. ø (c) C ONSIDERATION OF R ECOMMENDATIONS .—Within 90 days after receiving the recommendations developed under subsection (a) by the entity, the Amtrak Board of Directors shall consider theadoption of those recommendations. The Board shall transmit a report to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate explaining its reasons for adopting or not adopting the recommendations. ¿ SEC. 208. METHODOLOGIES FOR AMTRAK ROUTE AND SERVICE PLANNING DECISIONS. (a) M ETHODOLOGY D EVELOPMENT .—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, as a condition of receiving a grant under section 101of such Act, Amtrak shall obtain the services of an independent entity to develop and recommend objective methodologies for Amtrak to use in determining what intercity rail passenger transportation routes and services it should provide, including the establishment of new routes, the elimination of existing routes, and the contraction or expansion of services or frequencies over such routes. (b) C ONSIDERATIONS .—Amtrak shall require the entity, in developing the methodologies described in subsection (a), to consider— (1) the current and expected performance and service quality of intercity rail passenger transportation operations, including cost recovery, on-time performance, ridership, on-board services, stations, facilities, equipment, and other services; (2) connectivity of a route with other routes; (3) the transportation needs of communities and populationsthat are not well served by intercity rail passenger transportation service or by other forms of intercity transportation;(4) the methodologies of Amtrak and major intercity rail passenger transportation service providers in other countries for determining intercity passenger rail routes and services; (5) the views of States, rail carriers that own infrastructure over which Amtrak operates, Amtrak employee representatives, and other interested parties; and(6) the funding levels that will be available under authorization levels that have been enacted into law. (c) R ECOMMENDATIONS .—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of 2014, Amtrak shall transmit to the Committee on Transportationand Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate the recommendations developed by the entity pursuant to subsection (a). (d) C ONSIDERATION OF R ECOMMENDATIONS .—Not later than 90 days after transmitting the recommendations pursuant to subsection (c), the Amtrak Board of Directors shall consider the adoption of the recommendations and transmit to the Committee on Transportationand Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing an explanation of any reasons for adopting or not adopting the recommendations. * * * * * * * ø SEC. 211. NORTHEAST CORRIDOR STATE-OF-GOOD-REPAIR PLAN. ø (a) I N G ENERAL .—Within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, Amtrak, in consultation with the Secretary and the States (including the District of Columbia) that make up the Northeast Corridor (as defined in section 24102 of title 49, United States Code), shall prepare a capital spending plan for capital projects required to return the railroad right-of-way (including track, signals, and auxiliary structures), facilities, stations, andequipment, of the Northeast Corridor main line to a state-of-goodrepair by the end of fiscal year 2018, consistent with the funding levels authorized in this division, and shall submit the plan to the Secretary. ø (b) R EVIEW AND A PPROVAL BY THE S ECRETARY .— ø (1) 60-D AY A PPROVAL P ROCESS .—The Secretary shall complete the review of the capital spending plan and approve or disapprove the plan within 60 days after the date on which Amtrak submits the plan. During review, the Secretary may seek comments from the Commission established under section24905 of title 49, United States Code, and other Northeast Corridor users regarding the plan. If the Secretary disapproves the plan or determines that the plan is incomplete or deficient, theSecretary shall include the reason for disapproval or the incomplete items or deficiencies in a notice to Amtrak. ø (2) 15-D AY M ODIFICATION P ERIOD .—Within 15 days after receiving notification from the Secretary under paragraph (1),Amtrak shall submit a modified plan for the Secretary’s review. ø (3) R EVISED REQUESTS .—Within 15 days after receiving a modified plan from Amtrak, the Secretary shall either approve the modified plan, or, if the Secretary finds that the plan is still incomplete or deficient, the Secretary shall identify in writing to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructureof the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate the remaining deficiencies and recommend a process for resolving the outstanding portions of the plan. ø (c) P LAN U PDATES .—The plan shall be updated at least annuallyand the Secretary shall review and approve such updates, in accordance with the procedures described in subsection (b). ø (d) G RANTS .—The Secretary shall make grants to Amtrak with funds authorized by section 101(c) for Northeast Corridor capital investments contained within the capital spending plan prepared by Amtrak and approved by the Secretary. ø (e) O VERSIGHT .—Using the funds authorized by section 101(d), the Secretary shall review Amtrak’s capital expenditures funded by this section to ensure that such expenditures are consistent with the capital spending plan and that Amtrak is providing adequate project management oversight and fiscal controls. ø (f) E LIGIBILITY OF E XPENDITURES .—The Federal share of expenditures for capital improvements under this section may not exceed 100 percent. ¿ * * * * * * * SEC. 217. ACCESS TO AMTRAK EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES. If a State desires to select or selects an entity other than Amtrakto provide services required for the operation of an intercity passenger train route described in section ø 24102(5)(D) ¿ 24102(7)(D) or 24702 of title 49, United States Code, the State may make an agreement with Amtrak to use facilities and equipment of, or have services provided by, Amtrak under terms agreed to by the Stateand Amtrak to enable the State to utilize an entity other than Amtrak to provide services required for operation of the route. If the parties cannot agree upon terms, and the Surface Transportation Board finds that access to Amtrak’s facilities or equipment, or theprovision of services by Amtrak, is necessary to carry out this provision and that the operation of Amtrak’s other services will not be impaired thereby, the Surface Transportation Board shall, within 120 days after submission of the dispute, issue an order that the facilities and equipment be made available, and that services beprovided, by Amtrak, and shall determine reasonable compensation, liability, and other terms for use of the facilities and equipment and provision of the services. Compensation shall be determined, as appropriate, in accordance with the methodology established pursuant to section 209 of this division, if available. * * * * * * * ## TITLE III—INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL POLICY * * * * * * * SEC. 305. NEXT GENERATION CORRIDOR TRAIN EQUIPMENT POOL. (a) I N G ENERAL .—Within 180 days after the date of enactment ofthis Act, Amtrak shall establish a Next Generation Corridor Equipment Pool Committee, comprised of representatives of Amtrak, the Federal Railroad Administration, host freight railroad companies, passenger railroad equipment manufacturers, nonprofit organizations representing employees who perform overhaul and maintenance of passenger railroad equipment, interested States, and, as appropriate, other passenger railroad operators. The purpose of theCommittee shall be to design, develop specifications for, and procure standardized next-generation corridor equipment. * * * * * * * (c) C OOPERATIVE A GREEMENTS .—Amtrak and States participatingin the Committee may enter into agreements for the funding, procurement, remanufacture, ownership, and management of corridorequipment, including equipment currently owned or leased by Amtrak and next-generation corridor equipment acquired as a result of the Committee’s actions ø , and may establish a corporation, which may be owned or jointly-owned by Amtrak, participating States, or other entities, to perform these functions ¿ . * * * * * * * (e) AUTHORIZATION OF A PPROPRIATIONS .—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2010, to remain available until expended, for grants to Amtrak and States participating in the Next Generation Corridor Train Equipment Pool Committee established under this section for the purpose ofdesigning, developing specifications for, and initiating the procurement of an initial order of 1 or more types of standardized nextgeneration corridor train equipment ø and establishing a jointlyowned corporation to manage that equipment ¿ . * * * * * * * RAILROAD REVITALIZATION AND REGULATORY REFORM ACT OF 1976 * * * * * * * TITLE V—RAILROAD REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT FINANCING * * * * * * * SEC. 502. DIRECT LOANS AND LOAN GUARANTEES. (a) * * * * * * * * * * (c) P RIORITY P ROJECTS .—In granting applications for direct loansor guaranteed loans under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to projects that— (1) enhance public safety, including projects for the installation of a positive train control (as defined in section 20157(i) of title 49, United States Code) system ; * * * * * * * (d) E XTENT OF AUTHORITY .—The aggregate unpaid principal amounts of obligations under direct loans and loan guarantees made under this section shall not exceed $35,000,000,000 at any one time. Of this amount, 40 percent shall be available solely for projects described in subsection (l)(1), and not less than$7,000,000,000 shall be available solely for projects primarily benefiting freight railroads other than Class I carriers. The Secretary shall not establish any limit on the proportion of the unused amount authorized under this subsection that may be used for 1 loan or loan guarantee. * * * * * * * (h) C ONDITIONS OF A SSISTANCE .—(1) * * * ø (2) The Secretary ¿ (2) The Secretary may subordinate rights of the Secretary under any provision of title 49 or title 23 of the United States Code, to the rights of the Secretary under this section and section 503. (A) The Secretary shall not require an applicant for adirect loan or loan guarantee under this section to provide collateral. Any collateral provided or thereafter enhanced shall be valuedas a going concern after giving effect to the present value of improvements contemplated by the completion and operation of theproject. The Secretary shall not require that an applicant for a direct loan or loan guarantee under this section have previously sought the financial assistance requested from another source. TheSecretary may subordinate rights of the Secretary under any provision of title 49 or title 23 of the United States Code, to the rights of the Secretary under this section and section 503. (B) The Secretary shall, for purposes of making a finding under subsection (g)(4), accept the net present value on a future stream ofState or local subsidy income or dedicated revenue as collateral offered to secure the loan. (3) The Secretary shall require recipients of direct loans or loan guarantees under this section to comply with— (A) the standards of section 24312 of title 49, United States Code, as in effect on September 1, 2002, with respect to theproject in the same manner that the National Railroad Passenger Corporation is required to comply with such standards for construction work financed under an agreement made under section 24308(a) of that title; ø and ¿ (B) the protective arrangements established under section 504 of this Act, with respect to employees affected by actions taken in connection with the project to be financed by the loan or loan guarantee ø . ¿ ; and (C) the requirements of section 24405(a) of title 49, United States Code. (i) T IME L IMIT FOR A PPROVAL OR ø D ISAPPROVAL .— ¿ ø Not later than 90 days after receiving ¿ D ISAPPROVAL .— (1) I N GENERAL .—Not later than 90 days after an application is determined pursuant to paragraph (2) to be a complete application for a direct loan or loan guarantee under this section, the Secretary shall approve or disapprove the application. In order to enable compliance with such time limit, the Office of Management and Budget shall take any actions required with respect to the application within such 90-day period. (2) C OMPLETION OF APPLICATION.—The Secretary shall establish procedures for making a determination, not later than 45 days after submission of an application under this section, whether the application is complete. Such procedures shall— (A) provide for a checklist of the required components of a complete application;(B) require the Secretary to provide to the applicant a description of the specific components of the application thatremain incomplete if an application is determined to be incomplete; and(C) permit reapplication without prejudice for applications determined to be incomplete. (3) I NDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ANALYST .—The Secretary shallassign an independent financial analyst within 45 days of submittal of a complete application. * * * * * * * (k) R EPORT TO C ONGRESS .—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Passenger Rail Reform and Investment Act of2014, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the program under this section that provides information on loans approved and disapproved by the Secretary duringthe previous year. Such report shall not disclose the identity of direct loan or loan guarantee recipients. The report shall describe—(1) the number of pre-application meetings with potential applicants;(2) the number of applications received and determined complete under subsection (i)(2), including the requested loan amounts; (3) the dates of receipt of applications; (4) the dates applications were determined complete under subsection (i)(2); (5) the number of applications determined incomplete under subsection (i)(2);(6) the final decision dates for both approvals and disapprovals of applications; (7) the number of applications withdrawn from consideration; and (8) the annual loan portfolio asset quality. (l) N ORTHEAST C ORRIDOR F AST FORWARD .— (1) P URPOSE .—The Secretary, as part of the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing program, shall provide direct loans and loan guarantees to eligible entities described insubsection (a) for capital projects to improve the Northeast Corridor (as used in section 24906 of title 49, United States Code). (2) C OLLATERAL .—Loans made or guaranteed under this subsection shall require collateral equal to the loan amount requested. (3) I NVESTMENT GRADE RATING .—A direct loan or loan guarantee shall be made under this subsection only if a rating agency has assigned an investment grade rating of BBB minus, Baa3, bbb minus, BBB (low), (or equivalent) or higher to the project obligation. For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘‘rating agency’’ means a credit rating agency registered withthe Securities and Exchange Commission as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (as that term is defined in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a))). (4) I NCLUSION IN NEC PLANNING .—Loans and loan guaranteesmade under this subsection shall be for projects that are included in the most recent 5-year budget and business plan prepared pursuant to section 24906(a) of title 49, United States Code. (5) R EFINANCING .—Loans made or guaranteed under this subsection shall not be used for the refinancing of outstanding debt incurred. (6) C OHORT OF LOANS .—Subsection (f)(4) shall not apply to loans made or guaranteed under this subsection. * * * * * * * # Æ